Judging from Taiwan's recent battle against SARS, the nation's participation in the World Health Organization (WHO) is of great urgency. According to the WHO's Constitution, "The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion, political belief, economic or social condition." Therefore, when the health of all humanity is threatened by SARS, the WHO should not ignore the health of the Taiwanese. Nor should it exclude Taiwan from participating in the organization.
Taiwan was one of the original founders of the WHO. However, due to the mistaken "one China" policy in the past, Taiwan withdrew from the UN and the WHO after its diplomatic frustration of losing its UN seat to China. Such losses and serious consequences have lasted to this day, and Taiwan's attempts to return to both the UN and the WHO are still unsuccessful.
Theoretically, the WHO should view health as a human right, and take actions to pursue and maintain the health of all humanity. Unfortunately, it's difficult for the organization to rid itself of political interference. As a result, proposals for Taiwan's participation in the WHO have been arbitrarily and irrationally opposed by the Chinese representatives over the past few years.
Take the recent SARS outbreak for example. The WHO's investigation into the epidemic in China was repeatedly obstructed. Taiwan's attempts to understand the epidemic information there were also in vain. Neither have its efforts in and contribution to SARS prevention helped it enter the WHO. Such unfair treatment has hurt people's rights to health care, seriously damaging the purpose of the WHO, as well as health prevention work in Taiwan and the entire world. This deserves the attention of everyone concerned about human health.
The existence of the WHO is necessary. So is Taiwan's participation in the organization. We still have many tasks to achieve in order to push the nation's entry to the WHO forward. Those concerned about the issue have tried various ways to accomplish this. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Department of Health -- along with the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan and other enthusiastic civil groups -- have constantly lobbied foreign health officials to discuss Taiwan's return to the organization at the annual World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting, held in May every year.
In addition, there are as many as 189 non-government organizations (NGOs) that are related to the WHO. Government and private health professionals or human-rights activists are welcome to participate in many of these NGOs. By becoming official representatives of NGOs, we can also attend the WHO's meetings and therefore give full play to our influence. There will be much room for us to join the WHO if such channels could be opened.
I hope all parties in Taiwan -- especially those concerned about the rights of Taiwanese to adequate health care" and the nation's health diplomacy -- can actively join these NGOs with official working relationships with the WHO. By participating in international affairs and the WHO's meetings through such channels, we will bring our knowledge and professionalism into full play, so as to break through diplomatic barriers and overcome the oppression of China's "power politics."
This will not only protect the health of the Taiwanese but also help the WHO give full play to its function of taking care of the health of all humanity. This is a significant goal that we must not forget as Taiwan in its entirety is now striving to prevent the spread of SARS.
Chen Yong-shing is a former director of Kaohsiung City Government's Bureau of Health.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95