With the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) continuing to spread in this country, people in many communities are anxious and worried. The implementation of controls against the spread of the epidemic need to be improved. The government needs to take tougher measures to cut off exchanges across the Taiwan Strait to help block the virus from entering the country from China, Hong Kong or Macau.
In the face of SARS, the usual political wrangling has come to a temporary halt. Apparently, all the political parties understand that the only thing people are concerned about right now is SARS and no one is in the mood for political wrangling. Unfortunately, some politicians are seeking to capitalize on SARS fears.
KMT legislator John Chang (
In recent years, the KMT's repeated election defeats have undercut its political value. The private lives of many party members have also become tabloid fodder. Chang himself had to step down as the party's secretary-general after a scandal over his involvement with former entertainer Sophie Wang (
The illegitimate son of the late president Chiang Ching-kuo (
However, after the Ministry of the Interior legally recognized his status as Chiang's son, he lost a means to generate publicity. Then he started shouting about direct flights. Once again he grabbed the media headlines by pushing for direct charter flights during the Lunar New Year. Now that the political and media focus is on epidemic prevention, politicos like Chang have been left out in the cold. That's why he is using the direct links issue to grab attention again.
Chang's proposal for direct cargo flights shows how little he cares about this nation's security. Surprisingly, however, 17 of the 129 legislators who reportedly endorsed Chang's proposal are from the DPP. Apparently some DPP lawmakers have also leaped into the trough of cross-strait trade. This reminds one of the recent rumors that some DPP people have gained benefits by intervening in cross-strait business.
As the ruling party, the DPP has the responsibility to take care of the welfare of the people of this nation. Any self-serving acts on the part of individual lawmakers may cause the party to lose power and endanger national security. Chang's proposal may only reflect the interests of some individual lawmakers but it could carry a big price tag in terms of the security of the people of Taiwan.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers