Scientists from Russia have warned that the war in Iraq may lead to an ecological disaster. The disaster may include the leakage of oil fields, which can kill hundreds and thousands of seabirds and aquatic lives due to oceanic pollution. The use of biological and chemical weapons in the region could make the people there sterile or lead to unpredictable diseases. How are these consequences of war related to us in Taiwan, far away from the war?
The global linkage has made the people of Taiwan feel the war's effect on society, economy and people's livelihood. But from an ecological perspective, to what extent will the war in the Middle East affect people's lives and environment?
I recently attended the Third World Water Forum in Kyoto, Japan. If we take the hydrologic cycle and global climate changes into consideration, there is concrete evidence to show that the excessive emission of carbon dioxide is related to the erratic changes in global hydrology.
On the battlefield of the Middle East, the US drops thousands of new types of bombs and Iraq attempts to destroy the oil wells in order to prevent the US troops from invading. The blazing fire fills the air. The gravel sand and saltpeter dust blanket the battlefield. It is almost impossible to estimate how much of hydrocarbon emissions go into the atmosphere with smoke and carbon dioxide from the combustion.
We can easily estimate the damage to oil wells by the volume of oil leakage, but the damage from the large quantities of exhaust gas going into atmospheric circulation simply cannot be estimated. The atmospheric damage can accelerate the pace of climate change. We do not know where the next flood or drought due to climate change is going to take place.
The whole world will later pay a considerable cost for the war's consequences -- the loss of lives and property due to atmospheric damage.
The whole world will not be able to remain aloof. An ecological catastrophe brought by the war may come! The war between people makes the harmony between humanity and nature unattainable. And nature's counterattack is approaching humanity invisibly.
Global warming originates from the excessive emission of carbon dioxide. One region's industrial or war pollution can, indirectly, alter the hydrologic cycles in other countries or regions and even lead to natural disasters. According to the University of Tokyo, the heavy rain in Tokai in September 2000 brought 428mm of rainfall to Nagoya in one day.
In September 2001, Typhoon Nari brought heavy rain to Taiwan. The rainfall at Feitsui Reservoir reached 468mm in one day (almost one sixth of the yearly total) and led to serious floods in Taipei.
Last year, Taiwan had the most serious drought in recent years, leading to the deterioration of water quality and quantity in many reservoirs and soil erosion in the catchment areas.
These incidents in recent years are not only dealing a blow to our domestic water resource management but also seriously threaten the people's livelihoods and create a lingering fear.
At a time when we are confronted with water resource management and the adjustment of water prices due to water shortage in the reservoirs, or when we see on television that the war is doing damage to the natural environment and ecology, we should remind ourselves not to consume resources excessively. Allowing humanity to be in harmony with nature is an important way to ensure the survival of humans on the planet.
Chen Yi-jing is a doctoral candidate in the Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering at National Taiwan University and a member of the Federation of World Peace and Love.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers