The World Health Organization (WHO) still shuts the door and hasn't sent anyone over to Taiwan to help deal with the latest epidemic. The child of an American diplomat stationed in Vietnam is possibly infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). The health authorities of Taiwan immediately extended a helping hand to this American boy.
Director-General of the Department of Health Twu Shiing-jer (
As a result, Twu had to explain that when an infected person travels back to Taiwan by plane, he or she exposes the crew and passengers to the risk of infection. However, the boy in question took a chartered plane. As a consequence, risk of widespread contamination was significantly lower.
The opposition lawmakers may have sounded like they were speaking on the behalf of the ill Taiwanese businessmen, when in reality they were simply grasping at straws in yet another attempt to besmirch the government. They need to remember that on Tuesday the PFP had made a proposal for direct cross-strait charter flights for Taiwanese businessmen, so that they wouldn't have to make transit stops in Hong Kong and Macau where the epidemic is serious. The PFP proposal triggered an uproar. Everyone thought that the PFP must have gone mad over its love for China to the point where it had no regard for people's lives. China is precisely where the epidemic is most serious. No wonder some people have commented that those charter planes would have become "flights of death."
This indicates that the opposition camp is not only using the issue to take jabs at the government, but also to warm up to China. They couldn't care less about the life and death of Taiwanese businessmen. Their dearly beloved China is precisely the one standing between Taiwan and the WHO.
During an interview with CNA, American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal praised Taiwan for its exceptional and timely measures in stopping further spread of the SARS epidemic. This is worlds apart from the way China has been lying to the WHO and the world about the epidemic. Too bad most countries sit idly by and allow the barbaric China to muscle Taiwan out of the WHO. When right and wrong have been distorted by blurring the line between them in international health policy, the people of Taiwan can only pray to God for a better future. Despite paying frequent lip-service to "international justice," some world leaders seem to have no concept of what that is when it comes to Taiwan's bid to join the WHO.
Under the circumstances, the arrival of two officials from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in particularly warms one's heart and tells people who Taiwan's true friends are. The WHO openly admits that its decision to refuse any direct contact with Taiwan was made out of political considerations. The political reason to which it referred was of course Chinese pressure and the fact that Taiwan is not a WHO member.
Although the US does not have diplomatic ties with Taiwan and faces similar pressure from Beijing, it has spoken out on the behalf of Taiwan on a number of sticky issues. Based on the principal of reciprocity, it is understandable that Taiwan has accepted the American boy for medical treatment.
The opposition lawmakers' behavior has simply exposed their obsession with China and indifference to Taiwan. Unfortunately for Taiwan, value judgements are made based on ideology, even those involving life and death.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past