The Kaohsiung City Council has become a laughing stock. It is the first local council in Taiwan to have no one to preside over its meetings, which are set to begin by the end of this month. Both its speaker and vice speaker, as well as many of the councilors, have been detained on vote-buying charges stemming from last year's council elections. On Wednesday, the Kaohsiung District Court sentenced Kaohsiung City Council Speaker Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) to 22 months in prison for vote-buying. Chu is also suspected of embezzling a massive amount of funds from his own companies and is facing a breach of trust trial over that matter. The whole country and international democracy NGOs are watching what Kaohsiung will do next.
By law, the council can still recommend and elect a chairman among themselves to preside over its meetings. This will keep the council up and running. But even if the council does carry on with its meetings, what is the point of doing so if the council has lost the trust of its constituents? Embarrassing as it may seem, the council's predicament provides an opportunity for Taiwan to reflect on its level of democratization.
Kaohsiung City can wait quietly for the judicial process to finish, but that is going to take a long time, perhaps even beyond the end of the current council's term. Unless the court finds them innocent and thereby clears their names, the councilors will have to wear the label of corruption all the way to the end of their terms. They will not be able to raise their heads in pride when in the presence of their constituents. This will be an agonizing process for both the councilors and the city's residents.
If the judicial process drags on, the political process simply won't be feasible. According to existing laws, neither the speaker nor the vice speaker can be recalled until one year into their terms. They are therefore under legal protection now and cannot be removed. To avoid the taint of corruption, the ruling and opposition parties have expelled all their councilors who had been implicated in the vote-buying scandal. Now the council is in a party-less, anarchic state, with independent councilors comprising a vast majority. No party is in a position to control the councilors. The council is like a kite whose string has snapped, a kite drifting in the wind which no one can catch. Facing the imminent council meetings, the city government can find no party caucus with which to negotiate. City government officials can do nothing except brace themselves for the chaos.
The Kaohsiung City Council has created a difficult question for Taiwan's democracy. When neither legal nor political means can resolve the council's situation, one choice is to play along with the mess by letting the council convene and continue to operate. But this is like sawing off the rear part of an arrow that has hit you. The part of the arrow stuck in your body will continue to cause you unbearable pain. Democracy may be able to limp along in this way, but everyone will feel frustrated and no one will have dignity.
Extraordinary means should be used to tackle this unprecedented situation. It's best if the Legislative Yuan speed up the review and passage of the proposed referendum bill. Kaoshiung City residents should take it upon themselves to launch a no-confidence signature drive against the council and push for a full by-election so that this prickly problem can be thoroughly resolved. If we can turn Kaohsiung's crisis into an opportunity and push for a referendum law, we will also be issuing a stern warning to local politicians and aspiring politicians, which is still fraught with corruption and vote-buying. The people of Kaohsiung City will then be able to raise their heads and say that their city is not a failure in democracy.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US