Elections are all about image. And when it comes to local politics, this "image-is-everything" notion is accelerating.
Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is well known for being a charming and easygoing leader. PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) often reminds people of his hard-working image as a former governor of Taiwan Province. Among those political figures who try to attract media attention, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) happens to be the master of political spin.
In the face of a somewhat hostile media environment, Chen has been able to cover the media's lens with his own filters. Through unveiling inside stories and behind-the-scenes photos about his governance, Chen and his team successfully opened a door to the public and created an alternative way of public communication. The latest broadcast of A-bian Portrait (阿扁傳真) was the latest way to deliver Chen's message to the public.
Hoping to improve communication with the public and to cope with the opposition alliance's criticisms of the DPP government, Chen incorporated a similar mechanism to his counterpart across the Pacific Ocean US President George W. Bush with an aim to reach out to the public. During the authoritarian period, "the president" was an unassailable totem and instrument of power. But now, having gone through a democratic transfer of power, the presidency has gradually been given over to the common citizen, replacing its aura of mystery with new meanings of universality and transparency.
Chen's attempt to make the presidency a public arena not only displayed a great leap forward for Taiwan's democratization, but also encouraged a new kind of presidential leadership, namely, going public.
By going public, Chen realized he could show he cares for the day-to-day lives of the people as well as communicate his idea that government can be helpful to them. Going public can take many forms. The most conspicuous is the formal, often ceremonial occasion, such as an inaugural speech or press conference. It also involves casual activities such as going on a sight-seeing trip or making an appearance at an event -- all of which take place in public view and therefore can be easily remembered. Obviously Chen and his team continue to make weekly addresses free from media control and create an unbiased arena for the president to elaborate his ideas and policies.
One of the greatest challenges Chen faces is how to translate his campaign platform into feasible policy and accomplish his objective by substituting images for ideas. Judging by what Chen has completed, his utilization of the so-called "presidential card" has successfully captured the media focus and left the opposition no concrete alternative policy. Their only weapon has been ugly retorts.
Going public is not the only way for Chen to keep on the right track. He must also make use of his bargaining power to win support from the legislative branch, especially after the KMT-PFP cooperation.
In this regard, Chen must develop a mechanism to coordinate his own policy blueprints with the Cabinet and to persuade the congress to accept his policy. In this regard, the A-bian Portrait could also be served as a way to collect public support.
As the nation heads toward the next stage of democracy, the public will be more critical about politician's virtue as well as performance. Hence, the art of going public encompasses not just the old rules of embracing the people from the rank and file but most importantly, the essence of fulfilling the public's expectations. Chen will have only one year to show he means business.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers