A better teaching system
It is disheartening to note the chaotic confusion in the Ministry of Education concerning the teaching of English. A host of disparate problems (cultural, financial, political and pedagogical) are all lumped together, with a single solution -- hiring foreign teachers. As a foreign professor teaching future teachers in Taiwan, with 21 years of experience, I would like to clarify some of the issues.
The first problem is testing, which is so dear to the Chinese heart. All the students and teachers in this country have been tested ad nauseum over the years. Yet, Taiwan scores near the bottom (just ahead of Japan) in international scoring of English proficiency. Who is to blame? Everybody!
Let's begin with the teachers. Can our own teachers do the job? The answer to the question is no. Is it a question of competency? Sadly, after all the testing, we don't know, as the tests are divorced from reality (practical applications).
In Hong Kong, English teachers are examined in specific skill areas. The key to effective assessment is particular competency. Let us divide these skills into four areas: 1) basic competency -- to teach the rudiments of English, generalists who can teach some vocabulary, sentence patterns and pronunciation, for the lower grades; 2) oral skills -- focusing on pronunciation and conversation; 3) grammar/writing and 4) reading/literature.
All four categories would be subdivided into a) competent, b) advanced, c) expert. Proficiency tests will determine which category(or categories) each teacher falls into. A graduated pay scale would reflect teacher's skills and encourage teachers to upgrade their skills.
If Taiwan truly wants to improve the levels of English proficiency, it must take some immediate steps:
One, impose a maximum of 20 to 25 students in English classes.
Two, English instruction should begin in grade one.
Three, place greater emphasis on reading and literature (which lead to self-learning).
Four, there must be proper evaluation and placement of teachers (bonuses for relocation to remote areas).
Five, a series of experimental programs run by teachers colleges or universities should be used to determine which pedagogical approaches work best for Taiwanese students, so these programs can be disseminated nationwide.
Six, focus on teacher training to match required teaching skills.
Seven, open a few public English-language schools, where most of the material is taught in English, to prepare future teachers.
Eight, provide auxiliary activities: English clubs, English resource rooms, penpals, English-language music and movies, drama, debating/public speaking, etc to make learning English more pleasurable (perhaps the large number of foreign teachers in cram schools can be tapped for appropriate candidates).
Nine, make mastering English a social priority: music events, plays, etc for the general population.
Ten, incorporate cram schools into afterschool activities for students and adults.
Eleven, forget about making English a quasi-official language -- make it an official one or leave things as they are. Twelve, forget about hiring hundreds of foreign teachers from abroad and concentrate instead on teacher training and improving Taiwanese teachers' skills. You will never find a cadre of foreign teachers who are ready,willing and able to come to Taiwan (with Chinese-language abilities and TESL certification).
Thirteen, have newly certified teachers spend their first two years in remote locations to earn permanent teaching status, to relieve geographical disparities.
Fourteen, create a set of "master teachers" who possess the highest qualifications, skills and teaching abilities.
Fifteen, create special programs, under these master teachers to upgrade teacher abilities.
Sixteen, raise the salaries to better compete with the cram schools.
Seventeen, do not have a higher salary scale for foreign teachers as it will only cause tension (other grants or bonuses could be used if necessary).
The people of Taiwan deserve an outstanding English-educational system. They want better English instruction and are paying for cram schools and trips abroad to help compensate for educational deficiencies in this country. This is unfair to them.
Chaim Melamed
Pingtung
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past