When the DPP finally took over the reigns of government, no one ever foresaw that it would increase censorship.
The Government Information Office (GIO) has recently censored foreign films with a heavy-handedness not seen since the dark days of martial law. Despite all the rhetoric about freedom and openness, once in power the DPP has turned out to be very culturally conservative.
Last fall the GIO ruined the Golden Horse Awards film festival by banning public access to a number of foreign art films. One of the films the public could not see was Apocalypse Now Redux, the director's cut of a classic film based on Joseph Conrad's famous novel Heart of Darkness. Film critics universally consider it an important cinematic masterpiece. The New York Times called it "a great movie" that achieves "sublimity."
The GIO gave the film a very different review when they prohibited the public from attending the screenings. Apocalypse Now Redux was later shown on cable television, but originally only film students were allowed to see it for educational purposes.
That festival was just the start a new era of censorship. For example, the acclaimed Mexican film Y Tu Mama Tambien was recently shown in Taipei, but with dancing dots covering up the nudity. The GIO seems to consider it pornographic and harmful. More reliable film critics have a very different opinion. The San Francisco Examiner called the film "an absolute must-see." The BBC proclaimed it "a great film." And the New York Times said "the audience will have seen something unforgettable."
Earlier I wrote a letter to GIO Director General Arthur Iap (
Anyone who thinks that Taiwan is free will be disappointed to learn that the government is theoretically required by law to ban films for a disturbingly large number of reasons. If the censorship laws were enforced to the letter, almost every film would be prohibited. Media freedom in this country is not based on rights enshrined in legislation, but merely on the uncertain altruism of the government bureaucrats.
The recent rise of censorship points to a strange contradiction within the DPP. As an opposition party they portrayed themselves as partisans of liberty. But to succeed in elections, they must appeal to their core constituency of extremely conservative voters in the south. Even though very few rural voters watch foreign art films, the prejudices of southern conservatives now dictate what Taipei audiences can see.
As the country gets to know the DPP better, we are beginning to see how the party's ranks unfortunately include unsophisticated people who have little understanding of the world beyond this little island. The painful indecision that often grips the DPP reflects a culture clash between the provincial society of southern Taiwan and the diversity of the modern globalized world.
DPP censorship of foreign art films shows the party recoiling from foreign ideas that many of its members neither understand nor like. If this continues, it will be interesting to see how the rest of the world reacts. Officially the international community considers the government illegitimate. And yet this country continues to attract enthusiastic international support for one reason -- because the government supposedly embraces freedom.
Commitment to the humane ideals of liberty, human rights, and tolerance are the nation's sole source of legitimacy in the eyes of the world. Censoring foreign films undermines its only means of attracting international support.
Bret Hinsch is an associate professor at the department of history at National Chung Cheng University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US