On Tuesday, in the DPP's first Central Standing Committee meeting after the Lunar New Year holidays, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) appealed to all party officials to withdraw from media operations to make good on his electoral promise to remove political and military influence from the media. But his call prompted a backlash from certain members. The events which followed are worth reflecting upon.
A small sign can indicate a great trend. The issue of "removing party, political and military influences from the media" dealt with in the amendment to the Broadcasting and Television Law (廣電法) to be reviewed in the current legislative session is certain to take center stage in next year's presidential election.
The media entities in which the DPP is now directly or indirectly involved include terrestrial and cable TV stations, radio stations, newspapers and magazines. With its all-pervasive involvement, the party has also expanded its influence through indirect public relations and advertising methods.
Since the DPP came to power, there has been no end to skepticism about its "greening" of the media. Some mass communications scholars now joke that the problem of political involvement in the media has now been "transferred," along with the party's electoral mandate, to the DPP.
The demand that party, political and military influences be removed from the media was an important issue when, as the opposition party, the DPP used to criticize the KMT government.
It is also one of the main reasons why people supported the DPP. The transfer of power notwithstanding, the standard must not be lowered.
Analyzed from another angle, the safeguarding of freedoms of the press and free speech, just like the protection of human rights, is an indicator of the extent of a society's democracy and freedom. Are Taiwan's media now to regress, having reached such an advanced stage of development?
With the election drawing near, the government has boldly and resolutely displayed its muscle, including its commitment to found a national mass communications committee and to revise laws to guarantee the proportion of local films being screened.
It has embraced both reform and creativity. It is not difficult to conclude that the tactic of placing old wine in a new bottle is aimed at laying the foundation for a presidential-election victory.
But society should applaud the policy since, after all, it is correct, even if it has been delayed.
As to freeing the media from political forces, the reason for doing this is simple: a clear line should be drawn between politics and the media. Neither political parties nor politicians should attempt to achieve their political goals by operating or even controlling the media. This is a basic feature of a well developed democratic society. There is no need to elaborate further.
The principle that political forces should withdraw from the media should apply to all parties, without exception. Our leaders should put more effort into formulating public welfare policies and leave more freedom for the media. Left to their own devices, the media will naturally do a better job and the public will appreciate the government's efforts. By contrast, if those in power seek, directly or indirectly, to manipulate the media, they will end up loathed by the people. Many historical examples provide ample testimony to this.
David Chen is an assistant research fellow at the National Policy Foundation.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US