Tension between the US White House and Iraq is running high, and the Cabinet recently convened a meeting of its ad hoc economic response task force to discuss responses in the event of a war. They came up with seven measures, which focus on guaranteeing the supply of petroleum products and reassuring the public.
Since approximately 40 percent of the country's imported crude oil is derived from the Middle East, oil prices and the supply of crude oil have great influence on the local economy. Quoting data from Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Council for Economic Planning and Development believes that in the short term, war between the US and Iraq will benefit economic recovery in the US and around the world. Thus it should generally help exports and other types of economic activity.
However, if war drags on for more than six weeks, then the longer it lasts, the more it will be detrimental not only to Taiwan's economy but those of many other countries. Growth could slow to anywhere from 0.3 percent to 2 percent
Thus the uncertainties stemming from the threat of war will certainly have an impact on investor confidence, and this will be reflected in stock market volatility. The gradual trends over the past nine months toward economic recovery and stronger consumption and investment will be negatively impacted.
It is important to note that the force behind this economic recovery is growth in exports to China and Southeast Asia. Last year's economic growth still showed signs of being "outwardly oriented."
In other words, domestic investment and consumption were still insufficient. Thus, in addition to designing responses to war between the US and Iraq, the government should pay attention to domestic deflationary pressure and the problem of developing cross-strait economic relations.
Although the Cabinet has already proposed seven response measures -- including stabilizing the stock and currency markets, providing manufacturers with financing, stronger promotion of public works projects and expansionary fiscal policy -- whether or not these will be able to solve the problem of sluggish economic growth is a question that awaits further examination by the government.
Hsu Chen-ming is a professor in the department of economics at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers