The NT$70-billion special bills hastily drawn up by the Cabinet to combat unemployment hit a snag during a review on the legislative floor. To be fair, the Cabinet must take full responsibility for this.
The plight of the unemployed deserves our sympathy and it is urgent that the unemployment rate be reduced. If the opposition parties had wanted to act irresponsibly, they could have followed the Cabinet's lead -- even to the extent of raising the stakes by shelling out trillions of dollars on a project that lasts several years to eliminate the unemployment problem. So why didn't the opposition act charitably and garner more votes at the same time?
In 2001, the DPP budgeted a NT$16 billion stipend program for senior citizens in a drive to make good on President Chen Shui-bian's (
The bill's crude contents and the procedures adopted by the Cabinet have enabled rational voters to clearly see the ruling party's bad habit -- that it will stop at nothing to attain its end as long as the goal is correct; that it can ignore whether a plan is reasonable as long as it is well-intentioned.
This is the source of chaos that has led to today's economic doldrums and high unemployment. A government notorious for policy flip-flops finds it difficult to win the people's trust and support. Who will believe that the Cabinet's program is not driven by political factors or electoral considerations?
A careful observation into the unemployment-relief proposal raises many questions. If the DPP administration had not sloppily halted major construction projects such as the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant, undermining businesses' confidence in the government, the economy and unemployment might be in a less serious condition today.
Since the grave unemployment problem emerged two years ago when the economy took a nosedive, why didn't the government take steps then and put forth pragmatic programs to boost the economy and to combat joblessness? The government could have made a difference when making its budget for this year, but why did it choose to reduce the spending on economic development?
Why doesn't the government make effective use of the NT$20 billion Employment Security Fund? Why doesn't it improve the efficiency of the current construction projects before proposing a NT$50 billion public construction expansion program?
Where is the logic of creating unemployment on the one hand and granting relief funds to combat unemployment on the other? Since the government tried only to bring down this year's unemployment rate to 4.5 percent, what if these people become jobless again next year? Shall we forget about the matter until after the presidential election?
Many belt-tightening measures can expand domestic demand and create employment opportunities without increasing government spending -- for example, opening up direct links with China and allowing Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan.
Why would the government rather lavish money on missiles and warships to benefit other countries?
We still have plenty of monetary sources to cut down unemployment. Why has the NT$12 billion of the Employment Security Fund been left on the back burner?
Since the Cabinet could divert more than NT$30 billion for emergency use after the 921earthquake, why couldn't it do the same from the 2003 budget?
Before taking office, DPP officials said that carrying out reforms to reduce corruption could save up to NT$500 billion. Is floating debt the only way out now?
Some political parties have played the old trick by proposing to amend the Public Debt Law (
Trillions of NT dollars in debt -- ? from the 921 Earthquake Reconstruction Fund, dredging costs for the Keelung River, Financial Restructuring Fund, compensations for agricultural imports and the agricultural development fund, as well as non-business funds worth more than NT$600 billion -- ? has driven up the government debt beyond NT$5 trillion. There won't be a balanced budget in sight within a decade. This hidden worry for long-term economic development is also deemed a warning signal by foreign investors.
To boost its economy, Japan has carried out economic invigoration projects over the past decade, which in the end eroded the public's confidence in the government and resulted in a vicious cycle of economic stagnation. It is distressing to see that Taiwan is repeating its neighbor's mistakes.
We appeal to the government to reduce national defense and diplomatic expenditures and use the money for urgent needs.
In addtion, the government should stop dragging down the nation's economy by incurring more debt.
Yophy Huang is an associate research fellow at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Jackie Lin
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past