The Legislative Yuan has passed the NT$20 billion budget plan for expanding public services and creating jobs. But it has postponed the review of the NT$50 billion budget plan for expanding infrastructure until its next session. The effectiveness of such programs, however, is unpredictable.
From the workers' perspective, the government's NT$20 billion budget can save a number of them from unemployment -- although no specific plan or evaluation method has yet been made. They certainly have no reason to object. Legislators dare not block the plan either.
In fact, not too many people really believe that the plan was proposed to enhance public services. Nor do they believe that the government can solve the unemployment problem by directly hiring about 10 percent of the more than 700,000 unemployed workers.
In my opinion, the NT$20 billion is simply hush money to silence about 70,000 or 80,000 of the unemployed, those who demand the government solve the unemployment problem,and those who criticize the government's performance.
The key to the matter lies in the unemployment rate. Think about it. Instead of paying the NT$20 billion to the unemployed directly, why would the government hire a small fraction of the them to carry out public services that have not yet been planned?
One reason is that giving NT$20 billion directly to the jobless would give each person just a little bit of money. A more practical reason is that direct subsidies are unable to help reduce the unemployment rate.
The government's goal is only to lower one-tenth of the unemployment rate, which at more than 5 percent, is the highest ever.
President Chen Shui-bian
To solve the unemployment problem, the government has to tackle both cyclical unemployment -- which is caused by the recession of market and production -- and structural unemployment -- which is caused by workers' lack of appropriate professional skills for industrial transformation.
To tackle the cyclical unemployment problem, we have to stimulate the economy, improve the investment environment and expand our effective demand as well. Tackling structural unemployment means assisting the jobless to learn new skills.
The NT$20 billion plan will solve none of these problems. Not to mention that providing public services and classes have a very limited effect on the unemployed. After finishing these services a year later, it will only be more disadvantageous for them to find their ideal jobs. This will further worsen the unemployment problem in the future.
According to the logic of the government's policy, the unemployment rate will immediately drop after one-tenth of the jobless take the hush money payouts and are employed -- albeit temporarily.
In that case, a policy aimed at keeping people quiet will be considered a successful one, since we can no longer blame the government for the problem.
However, the unemployment problem will not be solved even if the unemployment rate drops. I'm afraid that the nine-tenths of the unemployed population will be ignored. This will make the jobless even more disadvantaged than they were before.
Liu Ruey-hua is an associate professor in the department of economics at National Tsing Hua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US