The stir over cult leader Sung Chi-li (宋七力), the attacks by entertainer Pai Ping-ping (白冰冰) and the Zanadau scandal all failed to bring down Kaohsiung Mayor Frank Hsieh (謝長廷). Will he escape disaster yet again over the vote-buying scandal surrounding Kaohsiung City Council?
Vote-buying in the election for speaker of the city council should be the problem least likely to sully the mayor's reputation. Although the administrative head of a city government will naturally be concerned about the results of city council elections and will also use the political resources at his disposal to influence those elections, it would be a rare chief executive who in the course of a mayoral campaign would be so bold and reckless as to get involved in buying votes from city councilors.
As the boss, how will Hsieh emerge from this situation in one piece? This is not just a judicial question; it is also a question of political credit.
The DPP threw its full weight into helping Hsieh in his re-election bid. In the process, it became the party with the most seats on the city council for the first time in the council's history. Very quickly, however, all these accomplishments, together with the DPP's entire credibility have been consumed by crisis.
It would certainly not be fair to blame Kaohsiung's corrupt political environment entirely on Hsieh. After Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) and his wife, Wu Te-mei (吳德美), were taken into custody Hsieh said bitterly that the city council could expel the mayor and other officials from the council's chambers, but since in the end the mayor's budget must be approved by the council, he could not criticize the council. All he could do was to hold back his tears.
Organized crime
The city council Hsieh faces is influenced by organized crime, has members who are suspected of major economic fraud and contains opposition party councilors eager to boycott Hsieh on the slightest pretext. Meanwhile, Hsieh's goal is to avoid being constrained by the city council and to accomplish as much as possible as mayor. A good record as mayor will be a necessary prerequisite for any advance in his political career. In order to establish such a record, he needs people like Civil Affairs Bureau director Wang Wen-cheng (
In officialdom, many clever subordinates depend on their own judgement to establish limits when handling complex matters. A clever boss need not concern himself too much with the details of these arrangements and probably won't ask too many questions.
Trust
This is a form of trust and also a sort of opportunism. The boss believes his subordinate can put everything in order, and subordinates shield the boss from being implicated in scandal.
Prior to the council speaker election, most councilors shared a common attitude. Among a batch of rotten apples, they were looking for a couple of relatively good ones. "Relatively good" generally means relatively beneficial or at least not too harmful to oneself or one's own camp. This is also a sort of opportunism. Not even the most heavily represented party can change such a corrupt environment. One can only try to stay out of harm's way or develop good relations with others for everyone's mutual benefit.
Opportunism has become a fertile ground allowing a corrupt political environment to continue to thrive. People who were originally just trying to stay out of harm's way need only drop their guard for an instant and they will be implicated as accomplices to a crime.
The saga of the Kaohsiung city council is an extreme case, but it is also a reflection of Taiwan's corrupt political culture. For someone in Hsieh's position, the rational choice (with a little opportunism thrown in for good measure) would never be to attempt to change this kind of environment.
By fighting with the city council, he would end up accomplishing nothing after four years. The public wouldn't understand him; his political enemies would criticize him; and his political future would be put in jeopardy.
The Kaohsiung city councilors are still acting opportunistically in their new roles as "tainted witnesses." One can imagine that after they admit their own culpability, their political futures will be in doubt. They will have no choice but to use the next four years as an opportunity to win back what they have lost.
But as a national political leader, Hsieh can't just hope for four good years. Now that he has been forced to fight for his political life and eradicate the possibility of opportunism, perhaps the situation can be turned around and Kaohsiung's political environment reformed.
Ku Er-teh is a freelance writer.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers