If we want to find out what went on in the runup to the vote for Kaohsiung City Council Speaker, the local prosecutors' office's tactic of granting amnesty certainly has its merits -- bribed councilors are coming out of the woodwork and, as the old cliche goes, "singing like canaries." Depending on just how much of this information is ever made public, we might well end up with one of the most complete pictures of the underside of Taiwan politics in operation we have ever been able to assemble.
Of course most people on the street and everybody in the news business knows some of the details of the myriad of scams and kickbacks that are the stuff of Taiwan political life. Over the years we have seen some rich examples come to light: Taoyuan county commissioner Liu Pang-you's (
None of these cases, however, involved in-depth disclosure by those who were intimately involved. Liu was of course dead, Wu still protests his innocence and nobody now wants to touch the Chunghsing Bills case, embarrassing as it is to hopes of pan-blue cooperation.
The Kaohsiung case might therefore be a bonanza. On Thursday the prosecutor's office offered to suspend charges against city councilors who voluntarily came forward and confessed to receiving bribes for their votes in the councils speakership elections. Yesterday evening some 15 councilors had come forward, more than a third of the total, under this offer. There is no doubt that if full and frank disclosures are provided by these 15 of what they know, or even what they think they know about Chu An-hsiung (
There's one problem with the amnesty strategy, however, namely that while we might eventually see Chu An-hsiung in jail we will also be left with a Kaohsiung City Council, a large number of the members of which have admitted to taking bribes in complete violation of the trust vested in them as elected representatives, but who nevertheless will serve out their time on the city council doing those things that councilors do -- making policy, reviewing budgets and overseeing the working of the city government. These councilors have shown themselves, on their own admission, to be grossly unworthy of the positions they have, yet they will be able to continue in those positions as a result of the amnesty deal -- no conviction for bribery means no disqualification from office.
Is this justice? It is hard to see it as such. Certainly the councilors' enthusiasm for truth-telling is expressly because they can, thereby, avoid the punishment they so richly deserve. The problem with the Kaohsiung Prosecutor's Office amnesty strategy is that it produces information at the expense of serving justice. A more oblique approach might have left us knowing less but feeling that Kaohsiung City councilors' blatant lack of virtue went less rewarded.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers