A press conference was held recently to promote books introducing the city of Taipei. The Taipei City Government, which hosted the event, had especially invited some long-term resident foreigners to express their views and discuss the various reasons that made them fall in love with Taipei.
As these guests spoke with fervor and assurance, I learned that Taipei's charm and glamor in the eyes of these foreigners are, just as I had expected, rather different from the positive things that we identify in the city. From their insights, perhaps we can once again find ways to turn Taipei into a charming capital city.
With regard to Taipei's development in the past few years, the foreigners focused on the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system. They praised the system for its convenience but apparently had no impression of other development projects.
They also praised Taipei's night life. The city's night markets, pubs and even the 24-hour convenience stores are just a few places that the Westerners think fantastic. The stalls in the night markets, in their eyes, contribute to an alfresco, street carnival atmosphere. The pubs are the best spots to "fish" for girlfriends. The MRT, then, is their tour train to the carnival city.
As far as the question of why the city government invited the foreigners to comment on Taipei is concerned, the officials probably believed that foreigners might provide a more objective view.
On the other hand, city officials may have been haunted by a natural feeling of inferiority that instils the constant feeling that foreign cities must be better than ours. When foreigners praise and admire our city, they may have thought, we can be sure that Taipei has become an international city.
As I have mentioned, the foreigners, regrettably, showed no interest in development projects, with the exception of the MRT. Rather, they were fascinated by the night-market vendors, the dance clubs and the sex industry, which the city government has been trying to weed out for many years. This can be explained by the appeal of the exotic but it would also seem to remind us of something more.
Perhaps we have been wrong in our approach to urban development in the past, so that the things we are ashamed of have become the glory and splendor of our city. Perhaps there are flaws in our urban values, so that the development projects we are proud of have been unable to win favor with foreigners. Perhaps our urban planning has no long-term, creative vision behind it and that undermines our ability to attract foreign visitors.
In light of the praise and admiration of these foreign residents, there should always be room for our residents and officials to reflect.
Lee Ching-chih is the chairman of Architecture Department at Shih Chien University.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US