On Monday, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) pointed out that the two biggest challenges facing the government are sinicization and the international marginalization of Taiwan.
Lu's definition of "sinicization" encompasses more than the cultural and social aspects, because it also stresses the economic aspects. In this regard, she is definitely right.
There are those who will probably question what is the difference between "economic sinicization" and "economic integration?" Isn't economic integration precisely the core of free trade, which happens to be the goal of organizations such as the WTO?
The problem is that "integration" is the combining of parts into a larger whole. After integration takes place, something new is produced. This is different from having one part taken over or engulfed by another part, which is exactly what happens with sinicization. What is taking place across the Taiwan Strait is an "economic sinicization," rather than an "economic integration." The flow of capital, technology, know-how and manpower is almost entirely one way -- from Taiwan to China. When Taiwan's economy is sucked dry, it will collapse, while the Chinese market continues to thrive.
Moreover, all the economic integrations taking place in other parts of the world will not bring upon the participating countries the kind of destruction economic sinicization will bring to Taiwan if it is allowed to continue at the current rate -- political extinction and a sovereignty crisis. There are many reasons why economic sinicization could have a devastating impact on Taiwan.
First and foremost, China has never ceased being open and up front about its intention to take Taiwan over, even if force must be used to bring Taiwan to its knees. Many optimists believe that, despite its refusal to denounce the use of force against Taiwan, China couldn't possibly attempt a takeover because of the foreseeable devastation it would do to Taiwan's economy. After all, a rich and wealthy Taiwan could only be good for Chinese economic development, so they think. But, if the economic sinicization continues at the current rate, Taiwan will eventually lose its economic value. Will China care about any potential economic losses to Taiwan then? Even Vice President Lu has indicated that there have always been those in the Chinese military who believe that Taiwan's economy can always be rebuilt after Taiwan is united with the motherland.
Secondly, the economic sinicization over the past years has hastened the cultural and social sinicization of Taiwan, further aggravating the identity crisis in Taiwan. Now, despite all the complaints about the invasion of Western pop culture, no amount of economic integration with the West can turn such integration into a threat to the host countries' political identity. Economic sinicization can have such a unique impact on Taiwan not only because of historical cross-strait ties, but also because of the past KMT regime's education of the Taiwanese people.
As for the international marginalization of Taiwan, China of course deserves the most thanks. Not only is Taiwan the only country in the world excluded from the UN, it also continues to be an outcast from the WHO. In terms of diplomacy, Taiwan can't even make any breakthroughs in Asia, let alone other parts of the world. Not only does Taiwan not have a formal diplomatic relationship with any country in Asia, but the fact that China has reached an agreement with ASEAN members to establish the largest free-trade zone in the world can only marginalize and isolate Taiwan further.
While Lu's remarks may be on the mark, very few people in Taiwan are listening.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers