The situations of the Taipei and Kaohsiung City Councils' elections for speakers and deputy speakers repeatedly changed by the day. Eventually, the KMT's Wu Bi-chu (吳碧珠) kept the speaker's post in Taipei with the PFP's Lee Hsin (李新) taking the deputy post. In Kaohsiung, both the speaker's and deputy speaker's posts were taken by independent councilors -- as speaker Chu An-hsiung (朱安雄) and his deputy Tsai Song-hsiung (蔡松雄) were elected thanks to KMT-PFP cooperation. Isn't it bizarre how independent councilors were able to manipulate the council even though they only account for one-fifth of the seats?
The apparent use of "black gold" in the speakership and deputy speakership elections in Kaohsiung is disgusting. The pan-blue camp can hardly pass the buck this time. The influence and impact of the bribery scandal are huge. Chu initially was backed by the DPP, but he was able to win the election due to the support of the KMT and the PFP. The DPP made a last-minute decision not to cooperate with Chu because of the speaker's notorious reputation. The KMT and the PFP's alleged criminal action this time has highlighted how "black gold" is second nature to the two parties. This will definitely affect people's impression of them as the 2004 presidential election approaches.
However, what's more serious is perhaps that the so-called KMT-PFP cooperation completely failed the test. Not only did they fail to cooperate in the elections in Kaohsiung, but they also failed to cooperate in the elections in Taipei.
In terms of the unity of the pan-blue camp, perhaps we can take the New Party as an example. The party almost collapsed after the legislative election last December. Although it successfully attracted 9.02 percent of the votes in the Taipei City Councilor election, the chance for it to be completely defeated in the next legislative election still exists. Besides, its return to the KMT is likely to take place, as New Party Convener Yuk Mu-ming (郁慕明) publicly expressed that his party wants to be the screw that holds KMT-PFP cooperation together. In the New Party's words: "Everything can be sacrificed for the sake of right and wrong on issues of significance."
Ironically, in the deputy speakership election for the Taipei City Council, the New Party councilors would rather die than support the PFP's Lee -- who switched to the PFP from the New Party not long ago, making him a defector in their eyes. They also complained to and protested against Yuk for not supporting the New Party's incumbent deputy speaker Fei Hung-tai (
Although the elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung are merely regional, the New Party immediately upheld the banner of "party autonomy." The party would rather destroy the unity of the pan-blue camp than sacrifice itself. How will it be willing to make a concession in the upcoming 2004 presidential election?
In light of the Taipei and Kaohsiung elections, on the one hand, both the KMT and the PFP experienced internal conflicts as their councilors fought for nominations. On the other hand, neither the KMT, the PFP nor the New Party was willing to make a concession. As the old saying goes, "A straw shows which way the wind blows." Can the pan-blue parties really unite under one 2004 presidential candidate?
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US