TSU lawmaker Su Ying-kuei (
At the same time, the KMT is intensifying its efforts to amend the relevant law, which prohibits a recall of a council speaker within one year of his or her election. While the KMT's desperation to catch its own fall is understandable, its efforts appear misdirected. It is questionable whether this amendment, in the long run would bring more good or more harm.
As much as the KMT may hope to undo its mistakes and as much as anyone may think the newly elected speaker Chu An-hsiung (
It would be entirely at odds with accepted legal practice to amend the law and then have it retro-actively apply to Chu as the KMT and the PFP are proposing. Moreover, legislative efforts targeting specific individuals are questionable -- if not downright unacceptable -- to begin with.
While it was both morally and politically stupid and just plain wrong to cast votes for the scandal-ridden Chu in the first place, once he has been elected he is privileged with certain rights, such as the right to not be recalled for the wrong reasons. It is like before his or her wedding, one is entirely at liberty to choose whomever one wants to marry, but once married, at least according to Taiwan's law, one can't simply end the marriage unless either the spouse agrees or the spouse has done something wrong, such as have an extra-marital affair.
Of course, had Chu engaged in vote-buying, then strong reasons would exist to recall him. In fact, if his election is deemed illegal to begin with, there may not even be a need to recall him. This is exactly why a speedy investigation and trial of the case is badly needed -- to prove that Chu indeed engaged in vote-buying.
It is disturbing to see the KMT threatening to decline approval of the government budget at the Legislative Yuan unless the DPP cooperates with the amendment efforts. No less inappropriate is the KMT's accusation that the DPP would be providing a safe harbor for "black gold" if it refused to support the amendment.
If KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Taiwan’s rampant thesis and dissertation plagiarism has reduced the value of degrees, bringing the academic system’s public credibility to the brink of collapse. Data published on Retraction Watch — a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers — showed that 73 papers written by Taiwanese researchers were retracted from international journals between 2012 and 2016 due to fake peer reviews, the second-highest in the world behind China. Based on the size of the academic population, Taiwan was the highest in the world, making it academically a pirate nation. Academic fraud in Taiwan can be divided into several types: the listing of coauthors;