The US is no trade saint
American Institute in Taiwan Director Douglas Paal is correct about the benefits of lowering tariffs ("Working toward a tariff-free world," Dec. 16, p. 8), but his contentions that the US is leading the way towards trade liberalization and that US trade policy is in part motivated by concern for the world's poor are misleading and disingenuous.
Again and again, the US has amply demonstrated that its trade policy is determined not by economics, compassion or even common sense, but by domestic political considerations. The administration which appointed Paal to his post has, in the past year alone, established new barriers to foreign steel to protect an inefficient industry in two swing states, larded out US$180 billion to subsidize agribusiness and is now engaging in semantic contortions to keep out catfish from Vietnam.
Trade liberalization is important to Taiwan and the rest of the world.
However, the US is squan-dering its ability to lead on this issue and opening itself up to charges of rank hypocrisy. Zero is a good number for tarriffs, not American credibility.
Jonathan Brody
Taipei
Where's the real news?
I find it disturbing that the local media has seen fit devote so much time to the tangled and chaotic private lives of Sophie Wang (王筱嬋) and DPP Legislator Cheng Yu-chen (鄭余鎮). Who cares about their ridiculous games? Why does the media offer them a stage on which to perform? They set a bad example and look childish and stupid.
Is this focus on meaningless gossip and sexual shenanigans in the mainstream media part of some government-media conspiracy to blind people with worthless information and make the people stupid?
There are more more pressing issues that could and should be discussed in the media ahead of gossip and stories of who is having sex with who behind who's back -- record unemployment, the fact that you have to take a diversion through Hong Kong to get to China by air, the issue of political/economic integration with China, gangsterism and why well-fed and comfortable teenagers are "depressed," ... it goes on.
What is the point of having a free and diverse media if it just produces rubbish?
Kev Lax
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers