Bush said it, not Jiang
It was US President George W. Bush and not -- as has been mistakenly reported in your article ("Bush to get Jiang's help on N Korea," Oct. 27, page 1) -- Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) who talked about the need for more dialogue on Tibet, during their press conference in Crawford, Texas.
It would seem significant, however, that President Jiang chose not to react negatively to President Bush's call for dialogue with His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
This could be encouraging. In the past, Chinese leaders have responded with lengthy discourse to any reference to Tibet by world leaders.
Also, during President Jiang's recent visit to the US, the Tibetan community either refrained from holding or scaled down the usual protest demonstrations, in deference to an appeal by the Tibetan government-in-exile.
It remains to be seen how President Jiang and the Chinese leadership will act in the coming months to respond to this Tibetan gesture.
Bhuchung K. Tsering
Washington, D.C.
We must never forget
You recently carried two articles on museums relating to Japan during the Second World War. The first was about a proposed museum for Jinguashih ("Museum complex hopes to revitalize old mining town," Oct 31, p. 4); the second was a critical assessment of the museum at the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo ("New museum upholds past militarism," Oct 31, p. 16).
The second article was rightly critical of Japanese militarism, however, the first article was not.
Of course, it may seem that a Taiwanese gold mine has nothing to do with Japanese militarism but in fact this is not the case.
To most foreigners, Jinguashih is better known under its Japanese name, Kinkaseki, home to one of the most notorious POW camps of the war.
Since 1997 an annual service of remembrance has been held here. This year's service falls on Sunday, Nov. 17.
It is to be hoped that the new museum planned for Jinguashih will not ignore the terrible conditions under which mainly British and Commonwealth POWs worked as slave laborers for the Japanese war effort.
I hope you will ensure that the Taipei County museum includes a section on Kinkaseki's notorious and harrowing past.
Should it fail to do so, we in Taiwan will be guilty of the same kind of historical revisionism that plagues the Yasukuni Shrine.
Edmund Ryden SJ
Hsinchuang, Taipei County
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers