The opposition's true colors
Though I may not agree with the KMT's and the PFP's policies towards China, because we live in a democratic and free society, they can represent these ideals. They strive for a "Great China," ie the PRC, and truly believe that Taiwan is a non-negotiable part of it. Even though history does not back their claims (Taiwan has never been a part of the PRC), they are free to say what they want, even if it is historically imprecise.
Nevertheless, what they can not do is to look down on the citizens of the country they are living in and their president. With an eye always fixed on Beijing and their feet dancing to the PRC's tunes, they are not helping the citizens of this country. With their attitude and words they are clearly despising the 23 million people of this nation. Their words are twisted and their agenda is hidden.
If sincere, they must go to Beijing (as so often they do) and surrender. It is their civil war (KMT vs the Chinese Communist Party) that is still unfinished; Taiwan was never a part of that war. If they believe that there is only one country that truly represents both sides of the Strait, which is what they imply when they fuss about President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) words, the one that is recognized in the international arena is the PRC. So they should go and apply for citizenship there.
Perhaps a fund could be created to help those who want to be citizens of the PRC but lack the means to do it. I know of quite a lot of Taiwanese who would be glad to donate.
Truly, there is "one country on either side," one is called the PRC, the other the ROC. Both are independent and sovereign countries. If they do not back this statement, they must decide with their hearts which Constitution they back: the PRC's or the ROC's.
Both the KMT and the PFP must be careful with semantics. Please do not use the word "reunification or unification" with China, a word-trap also for the TSU and the DPP. Taiwan has never been a part of "that" China and the ROC has long ended its absurd claim to be the government of all of China. More accurate would be to use the word annexation. And for this, I think, a basic agreement from the citizens of the ROC should be sought through a referendum. If Taiwan is to be annexed by the PRC, it means that its citizens will switch allegiance from the ROC government to the PRC one.
What Chen was saying with the "one country on each side" remark is no more than the "status quo" we have now.
If in the future we want to change the name of this country to make it more clear in the international arena or to better represent the real situation of the citizens of the country, a referendum is the best way.
Both the KMT and the PFP should visit a psychiatrist, but one not based in Beijing, where they suffer the same illness. They are enchanted by the idea that Taiwan is part of the PRC (or in other words, China). If they believe that, they must tell it to their constituents. Only then will we know their true colors. Maybe then their constituents will be aware of their intentions: annexation of the island by the PRC and the end of the ROC. Even better, they can try to convince the PRC to change its name to the ROC, and let Chen be the president of their "Great China."
Joking apart, at least the DPP and the TSU agenda is clear and plain; get up and let's transform the ROC into the Taiwan Republic. This may be bold, but at least they do not lie to their constituents, the citizens of Taiwan or the rest of the world.
Francisco Carin Garcia
Taishan, Taipei County
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under