The opposition's true colors
Though I may not agree with the KMT's and the PFP's policies towards China, because we live in a democratic and free society, they can represent these ideals. They strive for a "Great China," ie the PRC, and truly believe that Taiwan is a non-negotiable part of it. Even though history does not back their claims (Taiwan has never been a part of the PRC), they are free to say what they want, even if it is historically imprecise.
Nevertheless, what they can not do is to look down on the citizens of the country they are living in and their president. With an eye always fixed on Beijing and their feet dancing to the PRC's tunes, they are not helping the citizens of this country. With their attitude and words they are clearly despising the 23 million people of this nation. Their words are twisted and their agenda is hidden.
If sincere, they must go to Beijing (as so often they do) and surrender. It is their civil war (KMT vs the Chinese Communist Party) that is still unfinished; Taiwan was never a part of that war. If they believe that there is only one country that truly represents both sides of the Strait, which is what they imply when they fuss about President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) words, the one that is recognized in the international arena is the PRC. So they should go and apply for citizenship there.
Perhaps a fund could be created to help those who want to be citizens of the PRC but lack the means to do it. I know of quite a lot of Taiwanese who would be glad to donate.
Truly, there is "one country on either side," one is called the PRC, the other the ROC. Both are independent and sovereign countries. If they do not back this statement, they must decide with their hearts which Constitution they back: the PRC's or the ROC's.
Both the KMT and the PFP must be careful with semantics. Please do not use the word "reunification or unification" with China, a word-trap also for the TSU and the DPP. Taiwan has never been a part of "that" China and the ROC has long ended its absurd claim to be the government of all of China. More accurate would be to use the word annexation. And for this, I think, a basic agreement from the citizens of the ROC should be sought through a referendum. If Taiwan is to be annexed by the PRC, it means that its citizens will switch allegiance from the ROC government to the PRC one.
What Chen was saying with the "one country on each side" remark is no more than the "status quo" we have now.
If in the future we want to change the name of this country to make it more clear in the international arena or to better represent the real situation of the citizens of the country, a referendum is the best way.
Both the KMT and the PFP should visit a psychiatrist, but one not based in Beijing, where they suffer the same illness. They are enchanted by the idea that Taiwan is part of the PRC (or in other words, China). If they believe that, they must tell it to their constituents. Only then will we know their true colors. Maybe then their constituents will be aware of their intentions: annexation of the island by the PRC and the end of the ROC. Even better, they can try to convince the PRC to change its name to the ROC, and let Chen be the president of their "Great China."
Joking apart, at least the DPP and the TSU agenda is clear and plain; get up and let's transform the ROC into the Taiwan Republic. This may be bold, but at least they do not lie to their constituents, the citizens of Taiwan or the rest of the world.
Francisco Carin Garcia
Taishan, Taipei County
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS