Last December the Council of Grand Justices ruled in Inter-pretation No. 535 of the Consti-tution that the law "does not authorize police officers to conduct random checks or raids without regard for time, location and object." But regulations governing police behavior are incomplete and require revision in line with the interpretation.
Although the Ministry of the Interior recently proposed a draft "police duties execution law" to the Executive Yuan, some of the articles were strongly suspected by the review committee to sanction violations of human rights and the Constitution. The media has criticized the the ministry for its poor decision-making. But the police continue to conduct large-scale spot checks and raids on pubs and clubs, rounding up all the customers and taking them back to police stations for compulsory urine tests. Some prosecutors have strongly disagreed with these tactics.
According to statistics from the Judicial Reform Foundation (
The public mistrusts the system of policing and the officers themselves. Their tactics -- such as spot checks or raids, spying and using informants -- have become methods that encourage them to break the law. Lax regulation and administration mean that the police are forced to break the law to reach performance targets and conform to a vicious police culture.
The proposed law is aimed at preventing the police from violating people's rights. The bill would give police clear guidelines to follow. This will ensure that they avoid breaking the law unintentionally and release them from their current dilemma. The urgent need for such legislation is obvious.
The Cabinet has sent the draft bill back to the ministry for revision, but not because it fails to recognize the need for the legislation. On the contrary, the Cabinet is pressing the police to eliminate their bad habits of departmentalism and seeks to legitimize long-standing, inappropriate and controversial police tactics. It's time to change police practice now in response to the public's demand for procedural justice.
By acting within the law and upholding human rights, police will also protect themselves. What's worrying, however, is not that the ministry was unable to come up with regulations that conform with current trends, but that if the careless attitude of the police continues, the law will be ineffective no matter how good it is.
Lo Ping-cheng is a lawyer and an executive member of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers