Whither the US economy? Every piece of good news suggesting that America's recession is about to end is followed by bad news suggesting otherwise. The Federal Reserve Board's current monetary policy reflects this ambiguity: it is neither lowering nor raising interest rates. Instead, it maintains a "neutral" stance. The meanderings of the stock market are a similar indication of uncertainty.
Much of the discussion of the US economy is of little help, for it is focused on the wrong question: when did the recession start and end? Recessions typically are defined by whether GDP has fallen. But what is of real concern is the gap between the economy's potential and its actual performance.
In these terms, the US econ-omy's performance is likely to remain dismal. Increases in measured productivity mean that the economy's potential growth rate is now somewhere between 3.5percent and 4 percent annually. (There have been changes in the way we correct for price changes, so that what we measure today as 4 percent actually represents what we used to measure as a substantially smaller number.)
ILLUSTRATION: MOUNTAIN PEOPLE
Even when the US grows at 0.5 percent, a gap of 3 percent in a US$10 trillion economy means a loss of output of US$300 billion -- an enormous amount by any definition. The shortfall, in turn, implies rising unemployment. Given the huge gap, the US will have to grow in excess of its long run potential in order to get back to utilizing its resources fully.
Even with the surprisingly strong growth numbers for the first quarter of the year, most forecasters see growth over this year as a whole falling short of its long run potential, and by a significant amount, implying that unemployment will rise.
There is a simple interpretation of what has been happening to the US economy. The recession of last year combined an inventory downturn with an investment downturn. The first is now over; the second -- the result of over-investment in high technology and telecommunications, the sectors that were so important in the boom of the late 1990s -- may last considerably longer. There remains a considerable capacity overhang -- such as fiber optic lines that remain dark, having yet to see any light pass through them. Merely lowering interest rates did not, and will not, lead firms to invest more in these sectors.
The good news -- and the bad -- is that the pace of technological change in these sectors is sufficiently fast that much of the equipment may become obsolete well before it is worn out, or even used, enabling new investment to start faster than it otherwise would. Meanwhile, the US cannot expect much relief from exports, given the global economic slowdown, or from consumer spending. Typically, a rebound in consumption helps to re-invigorate the economy; but consumption has, almost miraculously, sustained the economy as investment has fallen, and thus there is little scope for a rebound.
The risks are mainly on the downside. There is a significant chance that with Americans' savings rate at dismally low levels -- sustained last year by car purchases and home refinancing -- consumer spending may moderate. Some of last year's sales, more-over, reflected purchases that would have been postponed until this year were it not for special offers inducing consumers to buy cars earlier than they otherwise would. Even Americans can consume only so many new cars.
On the contrary, a high level of indebtedness now afflicts US households. This sharp deterioration in the US fiscal position means that long-term interest rates have fallen little, even as short-term interest rates reached record lows. Rising unemployment adds to a sense of economic insecurity, and may further weaken consumption. Record levels of military expenditures are the only major source of expansion and while such expenditures may be necessary and do stimulate the economy in the short run, they do not enhance its long-term competitiveness and strength.
After initially believing that its economy was so strong that it would not only be unaffected by America's slowdown but also maintain robust growth, Europe has turned to looking to the US recovery to lift it out of its malaise. I think this is a risky strategy; if a strong US recovery is not around the corner, then Europe needs to act on its own, using the standard counter-cyclical tools of monetary and fiscal policy.
The threat today is not inflation, but unemployment. It is unemployment and economic insecurity that breed xenophobia and support for extreme rightist movements across the continent.
Unfortunately, Europe's hands are partially tied by a central bank that focuses on capping inflation, and a stability pact that, as customarily interpreted, limits the use of deficit spending as an economic stimulus. The challenge going forward will be to reinterpret these strictures. The prospect of sustained long-term growth and social justice requires that Europe's new institutions retain sufficient flexibility to reshape themselves as they confront new problems.
Joseph E. Stiglitz is a professor of economics and finance at Columbia University, the winner of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Economics and the author of Globalization and its Discontents.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused