Feel sorry for US sports fans
The 2002 World Cup Soccer tournament is an experience to cherish for the many delicious moments, the totally unexpected twists and the high drama. However, while the rest of the world stayed transfixed and glued to their TV sets, the enthusiasm shown in the US was only tepid, even when its national team was giving one creditable performance after another and reached the quarter-final stage.
Why this lack of interest? We are told the low scores in soccer exasperates and turns off American spectators.
It goes against the craving for quick results and tries the patience of an impatient nation. To the American psyche, the cascades of scores in a NBA match is sheer joy, while a classic soccer match that ends up 1 to 0 or 1 to 1 is nothing but boredom.
It is a pity and one should feel sorry for our American friends.
The charm of soccer is not solely in the final act of scoring. It is very much in the buildup, in the painstaking organizing of an attack, in the feinting and probing, in the intricate passes and crosses -- all combined to lead up to the climax.
Watching a Clint Eastwood punching and shooting his way to a climax can satisfy the list for instant gratification. It takes a more sophisticated mind to relish the meticulous method of a Sherlock Holmes in unraveling the sinister mystery of the speckled band and maneuver the evil Dr. Roylott into self-destruction.
The cult of quick result and instant gratification has claimed quite a few victims and done considerable damage to the quality of life in the US. Fast food divested itself of the joy of preparing and eating a good meal.
It takes patience, which is a product of maturity, to appreciate something slow in tempo but rich in flavor, something not that easy to achieve, something intricate or even elusive; refined gratification could be even more gratifying, whether one is participant or spectator.
America, we all appreciate and salute your benign influence on the world scene. God knows how many countries, mine included, owe their freedom and prosperity to your presence.
But please, America, don't yawn and switch to some other channel. Low scoring soccer can be as rewarding to watch as the relentlessly meticulous Baker Street sleuth with his magnifying glass.
David Min
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers