While meeting a delegation from the Chamber of Taiwan Businessmen in China (
I believe the recent rush by Taiwan's opposition parties to visit China was one of the major factors that prompted Beijing to change its stance on cross-strait talks.
The opposition is looking for a quick solution to the direct-links issue in order to counter the DPP on the unification-independence policy spectrum. Bei-jing is aware of the opposition's needs and has so has adopted a more hardline stance -- once again setting its "one China" principle as a precondition for negotiations.
Thus, the space for ambiguity has once again disappeared and talks on direct links have once again become bargaining chips in political wrangling across the Taiwan Strait.
On the surface, the opposition appears to be actively promoting cross-strait talks on direct links. In fact, however, it is merely making future negotiations more difficult.
In his May 21 response to President Chen Shui-bian's (
His speech, together with Chinese Vice Premier Qian Qichen's (
However, we can see that Beijing has changed its attitude after meeting with Taiwan's opposition lawmakers. We can get a glimpse of what prompted that change from KMT Legislator John Chang's (
Chang said the cross-strait transport links can be defined as (links within) "one China" that includes the mainland and Taiwan, and stressed that only such "domestic links" can be acceptable to both sides. His remarks echoed Beijing's official stance and are incompatible with public opinion in Taiwan.
However, such opinions have directly encouraged Beijing's officials to revert to their previous conservative positions on direct links negotiations.
Just as Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman Chen Ming-tong (
I have always believed the direct links issue has to be resolved through bilateral talks, but controversial issues can be set aside for the moment so as to facilitate the launch of the talks.
However, the opposition parties' China visits this time are not helping the direct links. Instead, they are compressing the existing space for ambiguity and pushing the two sides farther away from the negotiating table.
At present, there is no knowing just when direct links could be established.
Chen Chi-mai is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Francis Huang and Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US