Many heads of conglomerates have been clamoring of late for the early establishment of direct transport, trade and postal links with China. This, they argue, is in the interests of the economy and of the welfare of the people. More often than not, however, they are merely pursuing their own interests by portraying them as the interests of the people.
In the opinion of Kao Ching-yuan (
I have some questions about this. Who stands to benefit from lower business costs? Do they benefit a company's employees, national security or the local community?
Even the most basic English-language management textbooks will tell you that the boss is not the only interested party in a company. There are also the workers, consumers, suppliers, financial institutions, the media, community groups and the government. They are all interested parties.
Taiwan's corporate management class now only cares about one thing, however -- profits. The interests of the other parties must therefore be equated with the company's interests by the argument that, if the company makes money, everyone will benefit. Hence the logic: "With-out direct links, businesses will lose their competitiveness and everyone will have to live miserable lives in the future."
This logic equates the voices of all other interested parties with the opinions of managers, and thereby with the opinions of corporate shareholders. Every day, we see business profit and loss reports in the newspapers. If a company profits, that means business is stable. If it suffers losses, its share price goes down. Amid the vagaries of that mechanism, the people's interests are narrowly interpreted as financial benefits.
So when we see news that Tainan Spinning Co's (台南紡織) Vietnam factory is making healthy profits and the company's share price is rising, we don't bother to consider whether such profits actually benefit all interested parties.
According to my information, the factory in question has badly violated the overtime work provisions of Vietnam's labor law by requiring employees to work every day -- without even a single day off -- for an entire month.
What's more, the workers never received double pay as required by the regulations for work carried out on holidays.
Not only that, but when the company calculates overtime pay, it rounds off the figures to the nearest thousand dong less, stealing the "change" from each employee's paycheck.
Under such circumstances, can company profits be equated with the interests of the Taiwan-ese people? Will Taiwan's image as a country that respects human rights receive a boost from Uni-President's profitability?
In the media reports, the voice of the other interested parties are reduced to "good profit margins and strong share prices."
A similar logic is also being applied to the demands that the government authorize private groups to negotiate direct links with Beijing. But how about national security and labor interests? Why should we let these business people negotiate matters that involve the interests of the entire people? The masters of industry have had their say.
What we need now are the voices of other parties -- not private interests spun as the interests of the people.
Wang Hong-zen is an assistant professor at National Chung Hsing University.
Translated by Francis Huang
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past