Even though corruption in Taiwan may not be as serious as it is in other places -- Transparency International's latest annual report ranks Taiwan in third place, behind Russia and China -- there is no cause for complacency. In fact the report should serve as a wake-up call for the government, which has made cleaning up political corruption one of its primary goals. Two years of determined effort and the nation is still ranked as high as third?
The Ministry of Justice has received high public approval ratings since Chen Ding-nan (
However, all that hard work has been marred by the fact that many of the key suspects in such cases remain free, thanks to their status as legislators. Others have fled abroad and show no signs of planning to return. Such cases make the average person doubt the ministry's claim that everyone is equal before the law.
The Constitution only exempts legislators from legal responsibility for what they say on the legislative floor, not from criminal liability. The Legislative Yuan should not obstruct the judiciary by repeatedly citing what is clearly an unconstitutional rule that prohibits law enforcement authorities from searching its premises or detaining legislators when the legislature is in session. This rule has only led to legislators implicated in criminal cases fleeing the country before the legislature recesses -- and returning only after the next legislative session has begun. As long as they remain legislators they cannot be summoned for questioning or called into court. If they lose their seat, they can leave the country before the end of their terms and continue to evade investigation.
Legislators should lead by example. They are, and unfortunately, it is in the worst way possible. County and city council members are following suit -- declaring that they must remain above the law while their councils are in session, even if they are facing criminal charges. Two years ago the then speaker of the Chiayi County Council, Hsiao Teng-piao (
Most people don't understand the legal rational for allowing the legislators to break the law with impunity. What they do know is that the average person can't get away with such shenanigans. And they know that such regulations let elected officials get away with murder -- both figuratively and literally. Elected representatives have been linked to crimes such as illegally altering land-use zones, bid-rigging, illegal gravel mining and running gambling dens and brothels. The lesson appears to be that crime does pay, especially if you can get elected to public office.
So why hasn't the government tried to close this loophole? Simple -- some of the very legislators who would have to vote on such a change, are themselves implicated in criminal cases. Those whose hands are clean lack the moral courage to take the initiative and propose an amendment that is guaranteed to make enemies among their colleagues.
This is one of the stark realities of Taiwan's fledgling democracy. As long as such elected officials can get evade the law, the international community will view Taiwan as an "island of greed." This is one stain that will take even more than the much-needed rains to wash away.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS