Taiwan's drought is getting more serious. Apart from inconveniencing people in their daily lives, it is leading to the hoarding of water, the non-cultivation of land, work stoppages, unemployment and compensation payouts.
As the drought continues to create these problems, some social organizations are quietly initiating a river protection movement. Yuchih township (
Tatung Township in Ilan County has declared that it will protect the Sungluo, Chiuliao and Sichung rivers, all of which run through its area of jurisdiction. These rivers are important tributaries to the upper reaches of the Lanyang River, providing the Lanyang Plain with water for irrigation and household use.
The drought and the river protection movement might appear to be two distinct phenomena, but, as far as the protection of water resources is concerned, they are actually closely related. As Taiwan faces the difficulties brought about by an unprecedented water short-age, the river protection movements are exceptionally valuable.
Even though the river protection movement is largely voluntary, the strong, cohesive power of communities helps to spread popular sympathy for the concept of water conservation, both in theory and in practice. Also, most of the protected rivers are located in forest water catchment areas, where the effects of water resource replenishment are even more obvious. The river protection movement faces serious challenges, however, in terms of human and material resources.
As far as human resources are concerned, although local people are enthusiastic about protecting rivers and ecology, they often remain at a loss when it comes to future development. Without expert advice, communities don't know what the next step should be or how they should go about protecting the rivers. This often becomes a major worry for them.
As for material resources, since the river protection movement was started by non-governmental organizations, it relies mainly on local community assistance and voluntary contributions. Arranging activities and patrols requires a lot of resources and the financial situation becomes tight over time.
In light of all this, I would urge that, first of all, research institutions under government agencies direct the community river protection movement. Many research institutions, such as the Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute (行政院農業委員會特有生物研究保育中心), the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute (農業試驗所) and the Taiwan Forestry Re-search Institute (林業試驗所), already have a solid foundation in academic theory. The assistance of their expert teams would be beneficial to the river protection movement. It would also amount to an indirect form of implementation of the government's preservation policies.
Next, administrative agencies should subsidize the community river protection movement. The government often develops subsidy plans to assist communities in their activities. Apart from considering the contents of a plan when approving applications, the agencies in charge could be asked to consider additional benefits -- such as, in the case of the river protection movement, water resource preservation. Even though these subsidies would not be substantial, they would represent recognition of and support for the river protection movement.
Following the successful protection of the Tanayiku and Nantzuhsien rivers, protection movements are being initiated nationwide, a force that is gradually growing stronger. In particular, as the drought problem gets more serious by the day, we should place greater value on environmentally friendly, upriver water reservoirs. River protection movements would then present an excellent opportunity.
The government should grasp the opportunities offered by these popular movements and take the lead by gently guiding them, with the assistance of expert teams and financial aid for local volunteers. The conservation of water resources could then be achieved with less effort.
Over time, the experience of one particular area could be universally applied so that Taiwan's environmentally-friendly water reservoirs will be filled, gradually diminishing shortage problems.
Liaw Shyue-cherng is an assistant professor in the department of geography at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers