Taiwan's drought is getting more serious. Apart from inconveniencing people in their daily lives, it is leading to the hoarding of water, the non-cultivation of land, work stoppages, unemployment and compensation payouts.
As the drought continues to create these problems, some social organizations are quietly initiating a river protection movement. Yuchih township (
Tatung Township in Ilan County has declared that it will protect the Sungluo, Chiuliao and Sichung rivers, all of which run through its area of jurisdiction. These rivers are important tributaries to the upper reaches of the Lanyang River, providing the Lanyang Plain with water for irrigation and household use.
The drought and the river protection movement might appear to be two distinct phenomena, but, as far as the protection of water resources is concerned, they are actually closely related. As Taiwan faces the difficulties brought about by an unprecedented water short-age, the river protection movements are exceptionally valuable.
Even though the river protection movement is largely voluntary, the strong, cohesive power of communities helps to spread popular sympathy for the concept of water conservation, both in theory and in practice. Also, most of the protected rivers are located in forest water catchment areas, where the effects of water resource replenishment are even more obvious. The river protection movement faces serious challenges, however, in terms of human and material resources.
As far as human resources are concerned, although local people are enthusiastic about protecting rivers and ecology, they often remain at a loss when it comes to future development. Without expert advice, communities don't know what the next step should be or how they should go about protecting the rivers. This often becomes a major worry for them.
As for material resources, since the river protection movement was started by non-governmental organizations, it relies mainly on local community assistance and voluntary contributions. Arranging activities and patrols requires a lot of resources and the financial situation becomes tight over time.
In light of all this, I would urge that, first of all, research institutions under government agencies direct the community river protection movement. Many research institutions, such as the Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute (行政院農業委員會特有生物研究保育中心), the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute (農業試驗所) and the Taiwan Forestry Re-search Institute (林業試驗所), already have a solid foundation in academic theory. The assistance of their expert teams would be beneficial to the river protection movement. It would also amount to an indirect form of implementation of the government's preservation policies.
Next, administrative agencies should subsidize the community river protection movement. The government often develops subsidy plans to assist communities in their activities. Apart from considering the contents of a plan when approving applications, the agencies in charge could be asked to consider additional benefits -- such as, in the case of the river protection movement, water resource preservation. Even though these subsidies would not be substantial, they would represent recognition of and support for the river protection movement.
Following the successful protection of the Tanayiku and Nantzuhsien rivers, protection movements are being initiated nationwide, a force that is gradually growing stronger. In particular, as the drought problem gets more serious by the day, we should place greater value on environmentally friendly, upriver water reservoirs. River protection movements would then present an excellent opportunity.
The government should grasp the opportunities offered by these popular movements and take the lead by gently guiding them, with the assistance of expert teams and financial aid for local volunteers. The conservation of water resources could then be achieved with less effort.
Over time, the experience of one particular area could be universally applied so that Taiwan's environmentally-friendly water reservoirs will be filled, gradually diminishing shortage problems.
Liaw Shyue-cherng is an assistant professor in the department of geography at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US