For several days now, television and other media have run constant, frightening reports on water reservoirs drying up and dried-out farmland. Highlighting the seriousness of the drought and the need for water rationing is of course understandable, but if only the dangers are highlighted and no clear solutions are proposed, it will only increase public concern.
From the way people are rushing to buy water tanks or bringing home big bottles of water, we can see that people are competing to get their hands on more water, rather than saving it. If that were not the case, then why don't we see people in discount stores rushing out to buy water-saving equipment? Clearly the message to the public has only emphasized drought and water rationing, which has simply prompted people to try to solve the problem by buying more water.
It is obvious that the relevant agencies still need to make an effort at initiating proper water-saving concepts and methods for such measures to have any effect. In fact, the UN's World Meteorology Organization and many research reports have already predicted a future tendency toward a global increase in droughts and flooding. Water has therefore become a most important and precious resource for every country, and aggressive water preservation and efficient water-resource management are already important policies in many countries, integrated with policies for sustainable development.
In fact, domestic water fees have been rather low for a long time. Not only do they not reflect the real cost of providing water, but they also do not consider the huge funds that will be needed to develop new water resources in the future, which is not very cost-efficient. No wonder the people of Taiwan lack the concept as well as habit of conserving water.
According to information published on the Taiwan Water Supply Corp's (
Citizens, large companies and public institutions in Taipei must start to aggressively save water, otherwise it will be impossible to solve the problem by transporting water to Taipei from the south. Kuo Yao-chi (郭瑤琪), executive-general of the Cabinet's disaster relief center, said recently that she had "requested that the Ministry of National Defense prepare and inspect 12 transport boats for the transportation of water from the south to the north of the island. Transported volumes will be low, however, and we still haven't figured out how to move the water from the Tsengwen Reservoir to the boats."
This is quite a fantastic idea, perhaps inspired by the selling of water by Mawei in China's Fujian province to Matsu. It is doubtful whether such a strategy would be feasible and cost efficient, and whether it would bring a fundamental solution to the drought. These issues should be carefully considered before a real solution is proposed.
As the nation's leader, President Chen Shui-bian (
Singapore is an excellent example of a place that has had a water conservation plan in place for over a decade, with excellent results. The main points of the city-state's plan can serve as a good point of reference for Taiwan.
Singapore has improved education regarding water conservation. Apart from propaganda and demonstrations, water-saving activities and competitions among communities and schools are frequently arranged, and the concept of saving water has been firmly planted in the minds of the public with the help of the mass media.
Families in Singapore also receive assistance to install water-saving equipment, and all office buildings, schools, hospitals and apartment complexes are required to install water-saving water tanks and taps. Industrial cooling water must be reused, and boilers must be equipped with pre-treatment equipment. This can save large volumes of water.
For example, the recycling of water at Singapore's chip foundries is in excess of 70 percent, something which manufacturers in Taiwan should actively emulate. Water for irrigating parks, sports arenas and golf courses must be treated waste water and cannot be running water. Car washes must install recycling equipment and can also not rely on running water only. Recycling must be in excess of 80 percent. Investigation of water leaks has also been strengthened. Apart from routine checks on water usage and water leakage as well as improved water pipe maintenance, industry and other large water users are required to carry out regular checks for water leakage by themselves to save water. The supply of water is clearly regulated. Regulations and rewards for saving water have been improved, and fines have been increased to stop obvious waste of water and illegal water usage. Taiwan should strive to emulate such progress.
Sue Lin is a professor in the department of environment engineering at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US