For several days now, television and other media have run constant, frightening reports on water reservoirs drying up and dried-out farmland. Highlighting the seriousness of the drought and the need for water rationing is of course understandable, but if only the dangers are highlighted and no clear solutions are proposed, it will only increase public concern.
From the way people are rushing to buy water tanks or bringing home big bottles of water, we can see that people are competing to get their hands on more water, rather than saving it. If that were not the case, then why don't we see people in discount stores rushing out to buy water-saving equipment? Clearly the message to the public has only emphasized drought and water rationing, which has simply prompted people to try to solve the problem by buying more water.
It is obvious that the relevant agencies still need to make an effort at initiating proper water-saving concepts and methods for such measures to have any effect. In fact, the UN's World Meteorology Organization and many research reports have already predicted a future tendency toward a global increase in droughts and flooding. Water has therefore become a most important and precious resource for every country, and aggressive water preservation and efficient water-resource management are already important policies in many countries, integrated with policies for sustainable development.
In fact, domestic water fees have been rather low for a long time. Not only do they not reflect the real cost of providing water, but they also do not consider the huge funds that will be needed to develop new water resources in the future, which is not very cost-efficient. No wonder the people of Taiwan lack the concept as well as habit of conserving water.
According to information published on the Taiwan Water Supply Corp's (
Citizens, large companies and public institutions in Taipei must start to aggressively save water, otherwise it will be impossible to solve the problem by transporting water to Taipei from the south. Kuo Yao-chi (郭瑤琪), executive-general of the Cabinet's disaster relief center, said recently that she had "requested that the Ministry of National Defense prepare and inspect 12 transport boats for the transportation of water from the south to the north of the island. Transported volumes will be low, however, and we still haven't figured out how to move the water from the Tsengwen Reservoir to the boats."
This is quite a fantastic idea, perhaps inspired by the selling of water by Mawei in China's Fujian province to Matsu. It is doubtful whether such a strategy would be feasible and cost efficient, and whether it would bring a fundamental solution to the drought. These issues should be carefully considered before a real solution is proposed.
As the nation's leader, President Chen Shui-bian (
Singapore is an excellent example of a place that has had a water conservation plan in place for over a decade, with excellent results. The main points of the city-state's plan can serve as a good point of reference for Taiwan.
Singapore has improved education regarding water conservation. Apart from propaganda and demonstrations, water-saving activities and competitions among communities and schools are frequently arranged, and the concept of saving water has been firmly planted in the minds of the public with the help of the mass media.
Families in Singapore also receive assistance to install water-saving equipment, and all office buildings, schools, hospitals and apartment complexes are required to install water-saving water tanks and taps. Industrial cooling water must be reused, and boilers must be equipped with pre-treatment equipment. This can save large volumes of water.
For example, the recycling of water at Singapore's chip foundries is in excess of 70 percent, something which manufacturers in Taiwan should actively emulate. Water for irrigating parks, sports arenas and golf courses must be treated waste water and cannot be running water. Car washes must install recycling equipment and can also not rely on running water only. Recycling must be in excess of 80 percent. Investigation of water leaks has also been strengthened. Apart from routine checks on water usage and water leakage as well as improved water pipe maintenance, industry and other large water users are required to carry out regular checks for water leakage by themselves to save water. The supply of water is clearly regulated. Regulations and rewards for saving water have been improved, and fines have been increased to stop obvious waste of water and illegal water usage. Taiwan should strive to emulate such progress.
Sue Lin is a professor in the department of environment engineering at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers