A few days ago, Premier Yu Shyi-kun reaffirmed his ideals of promoting a humanist spirit and simplicity in government. The words mirror the man. We have great admiration for the premier, however, we would like to submit our suggestions, to the "combative Cabinet."
Traffic problems are a major concern of the public. Although there is never any shortage of policy suggestions on the issue, many of them are simply rub-bish. Some major projects are proposed in order to fulfil campaign promises, as well as to boost the economy. These construction projects, which cost hundreds of billions of dollars, usually drag on for years.
Other projects are proposed in order to improve local infrastructure. These projects usually wipe out the budgets of local governments. This has gone on now for a few decades, but the public's dissatisfaction with thetraffic situation continues to grow despite the plethora of projects. The problems lie mostly in the uncertainty and inconsistency of transport policy.
The National Eastern Freeway (東部國道), the National Central Cross-island Highway (中橫國道) and the National Southern Cross-island Freeway (南橫國道) construction projects have featured frequently as election issues. But they have never been taken seriously by our transport authorities.
It would also seem premature to welcome the proposed international airport in central Taiwan given the size of its likely market. Given its financial difficulties, the government should not be proposing such a major project which has the effect of causing other construction projects to be neglected. Why propose such a grand project when it is of such questionable value?
It is not good policy to seek to boost tourism in eastern Taiwan by building freeways and allowing cars to rush to the east on weekends and holidays. Local residents may not profit from such investments, while tourist spots may suffer because of large crowds. What we should do is encourage our tourists to use local transport. The government must not ruin the environment of the east by building freeways that are not of much use.
The total budget for the above freeway constructions is estimated to be NT$300 billion. If we were to take one-tenth of that budget to create a special fund to develop eastern Taiwan, annual interest on the fund would be as high as NT$1.5 billion. That would be quite sufficient to enable us to subsidize the tourist industry, as well as to train local tour guides. We truly believe that this is a transport policy that is manageable, practical and feasible.
Last, and most frequently forgotten, the government has lacked the necessary will and therefore failed to make a substantial input into improving traffic in urban areas for many years. As globalization continues, the world's major cities have to compete with one another. A city without an efficient mass rapid transit system will never have an opportunity to play a significant role on the world stage. Insufficient or unpunctual transportation is an economic weakness; chaotic traffic reduces people's quality of life. How can Taiwan attract talent and develop a knowledge-based economy under such circumstances?
Issues ranging from investments in transportation and improvement of bus services to the enactment of the Mass Transportation Act (大眾運輸條例) must all be included in the Cabinet's action plan so that we can develop a highly pragmatic transportation policy.
Wang Ching-ruey is chairman of the Chinese Institute of Transportation; Chiang Yu-sheng is a director of the CIT; Hochen Tan is also a director of the CIT and former executive vice minister of transportation and communications.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers