A reorganization of Taiwan's military was enacted on March 1 in which all presidential authority over the armed forces was transferred to the defense minister, who used to be responsible for the administrative system only. Under the new National Defense Law (國防法) and Defense Ministry Organizational Law (國防組織法), the defense minister is the highest official in charge of all military affairs. It is one of the recent changes, both inside and outside Taiwan, that have created a window of opportunity for establishing confidence-building measures across the Taiwan Strait.
The domestic political situation in Taiwan has now matured enough for rapprochement with China. President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has moved toward the middle ground since he was elected in March 2000. The success of the DPP in last year's legislative elections has consolidated his powerbase and he now has more resources with which to play the role of Nixon in Taiwan. Chen, at a ceremony marking the enactment of the new military structure, said: "Military conflict between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait is against the interests of both sides and the primary goal of the military is to maintain the peace." He urged Beijing to build mutual-trust mechanisms to maintain cross-strait peace.
Tang Yao-ming (湯曜明), Taiwan's defense minister since Feb. 1, understands well that the major goal of Taiwan's armed forces is to prevent war. In fact, during his time as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Tang worked to enhance the transparency of Taiwan's military affairs to reduce the chance of a misunderstanding sparking a conflict with China. In his first speech as defense minister, Tang even said building confidence across the Strait was one of his top priorities.
China's interests will be better served by cooperation rather than intimidation. As a rising power, Beijing's leaders are intelligent enough to realize that China's economic development depends on a stable political environment, both domestically and internationally. Any serious attempt to use force in the Strait would dislocate China's fragile economy. In fact, the majority of people in China are also reluctant to see any conflict with Taiwan. According to a survey released on March 2, 92 percent of interviewees agreed with Bush's stand on a "peaceful resolution" of cross-strait issues.
Since both Taiwan and China became members of the WTO last year, economic and trade ties will expand further, raising the cost of conflict. A war would interrupt the foreign trade on which China is increasingly dependent. The Chinese government will also be reluctant to resolve the Taiwan issue militarily while it prepares to stage the 2008 Olympic Games.
Finally, relations among Washington, Beijing and Taipei have become stable enough to build confidence across the Strait. As with the Clinton administration, Taiwan remains a key foreign-affairs issue in the administration of US President George W. Bush. However, unlike Clinton, who made too many concessions to Beijing during his visit to China in 1998, Bush has taken a tougher line, reiterating his support for the Taiwan Relations Act, a 1979 law requiring the US to sell defensive arms to Taiwan, during his visit to Beijing last month.
Bush wisely and correctly pointed out in his speech in Qinghua University (清華大學) that he wants a "peaceful resolution" to the standoff between Taipei and Beijing. Maintaining the status quo in the Strait serves the best interests of the US. Any sign that Washington is favoring one side or the other risks emboldening one or the other to challenge that status quo. Confidence-building measures across the Strait are also a goal of the US.
China's democratization deserves praise. However, it is wrong, as Clinton did, to support China's democratization at the expense of Taiwan, a democratic and free society already. According to Zalmay Khalilzad, a researcher at the RAND think tank in the US who co-authored a paper titled "Taking Charge: A Bipartisan Report to the President Elect on Foreign Policy and National Security," the US should promote a dialogue about security among all Asian countries to provide a forum to solve regional disputes and promote confidence-building measures. Establishing confidence-building measures across the Taiwan Strait is a good way for Bush to show his global leadership.
Antonio C. Hsiang is assistant professor at the Institute for Latin American Studies, Tamkang University.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US