A recent survey in the Hsinchu Science-based Industrial Park shows that, in response to the newly-enacted Gender Equality Labor Law (
The logic that leads to such a conclusion still holds ground in Taiwan because businesses want simply to remain traditional industries and have no aspirations to increase the scale of their activities. In the logic of the knowledge-based economic era, however, the cultivation of human resources is key to competitiveness. US companies, for example, try everything they can to attract innovative and capable workers with high salaries and generous welfare packages. No company with great aspirations will resent its manpower costs, much less sift out workers of a particular gender. That is why the high-tech industry in the US is way ahead of those of other countries today.
Due to the rapid economic and social development of the past 10 years, there is no longer a gap between women and men in Taiwan in terms of educational level. The employment rate for women has remained at around 45 percent, lower than the figures for Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore. This is because women in Taiwan have been shackled by their social roles (many leave their jobs voluntarily or involuntarily after marriage or childbirth), or have experienced gender discrimination and employment inequalities in the workplace.
The new law should radically redress the disadvantages they face, so that Taiwan can continue its development and improve the way it uses its human resources. This will not only help improve Taiwan's reputation on human rights, but will also allow the country to connect seamlessly with the operational logic of international corporations.
Most of the multinationals and foreign businesses that have invested and built factories in Taiwan offer incentives to their employees that are based on the standards of their own countries. Many talented men and women are therefore attracted to these businesses. Homegrown companies, on the other hand, face a shortage of high-level human resources and often have to employ people from other countries. They don't necessarily spend any less than the foreign companies because their management and communication costs are increased.
Raising employees' benefits and working conditions to the level of those of their foreign counterparts could help local companies get outstanding local talent to work for them. Within multinational cooperations, it may even prevent disputes and integration difficulties caused by large gaps in labor conditions. The new law provides an important basis for upgrading Taiwan's industries.
Traditional employment models are now increasingly a thing of the past. Meanwhile, the service sector and the newly emerging knowledge-based industries are thriving. The traditional models do not serve adequately to cultivate human resources for these industries. One example is Nokia, of Finland, a country that cherishes its female labor force.
Nokia has a higher ratio of female employees than other corporations. The dramatic rise in the proportions of female employees in newly emerging sectors also reflect a rise in corporate profits and business scale. It is a result of putting the female labor force to good use.
Finally, I hope that following the enactment of the new law, both management and employees will work together to raise Tai-wan's overall competitiveness.
Hsu Chia-ching is secretary-general of the Taiwan Women's Link.
Translated by Francis Huang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers