China is now an active member of the world economic and political community. Many Chinese now enjoy relative affluence and greater personal freedom, even as other Chinese citizens are racked by the travails of modernization.
Some commentators expect that China's entry into the WTO will accelerate these trends and may even precipitate fundamental political change. Although momentum will be slower than many are hoping for, the changes exacted by WTO membership will be profound because China's future will be determined more than ever by factors beyond Bei-jing's control.
Moreover, WTO membership will not only prevent backsliding but will raise fundamental questions about national sovereignty, as well as powerful debates about the amount of foreign engagement China is willing to tolerate.
The impact will profoundly affect social and political life. Although some analysts produced doomsday scenarios about unrest from rising unemployment and inequality, liberal intellectuals in China welcome membership as a catalyst for greater rule-bound and democratic political order. In reality, entry will push forward trends set in motion well before China joined the WTO. The demise of the old economic order will be has-tened while private enterprise and new sectors will become ever more privileged.
In the social realm, WTO entry will force the restructuring of the labor force into extremes of wealth and poverty. As part of this process, the concentration of foreign direct investment (FDI) along the coast will continue to exacerbate regional inequalities.
In 1998, Guangdong Province alone received 26.5 percent of FDI into China, while the entire west of China received 3 percent. As a result, those living in Shanghai enjoy a real income twice that of the northwest and 60 percent higher than the southwest. Stark differences in the levels of education, resource endowment and labor skills mean that, with WTO entry, the already privileged coastal areas will continue to advance faster than inland areas.
Increased economic competition will add to unemployment in the state-owned sector, with job creation in the private sector failing to make up the shortfall. The real unemployment rate in the northeast, for example, is already over 10 percent and this region will feel the strongest impact of agricultural restructuring.
While much of China will gain from agricultural diversification, areas such as the northeast that are overly dependent on grain production will suffer because, under the WTO, China will import much cheaper and better quality grain, causing rural incomes to decline even further. Migration to the cities will be the only choice for many peasants.
It is no surprise, then, that rural and urban unrest is mounting. China's leadership must address this rising tide of disaffection when calculating the pace with which to move ahead with WTO compliance. The Chinese Communist Party must decide how to accommodate the social forces that will benefit from further globalization while disentangling itself from its traditional power base, the state-owned sector.
To deal with the increasing social cleavages resulting from WTO membership, China will have to develop a competitive political marketplace parallel to the economic one. Doubtless such changes will be difficult for the party to accept.
Equally necessary will be further development of a legal and regulatory framework to improve the environment for domestic and international investment. Here the major challenge will be for the party to accept that WTO membership presumes that disputes will be resolved by an independent, rules-based, supra-national body rather than by party fiat or through the mediation of local political connections. Within China, pressure will mount for a more independent judiciary to adjudicate on economic issues and create greater transparency in international transactions. Such changes will not be easy for party members to swallow.
The developed economies of the world can facilitate this process. Sluggish progress may be unacceptable, but outsiders must recognize that the party must balance the imperatives of progress against mushrooming social unrest. China has agreed to implement its WTO commitments in a stunningly short period of time that can only have been agreed to because of extreme US pressure.
But China is too big and too political to be pushed so fast that it is not permitted sufficient time to adapt properly. Cooler heads must prevail around the world so that China is not taken to WTO dispute mechanisms for every insignificant infraction. In short, there needs to be political maturity exercised by everyone as China integrates with the world economy.
Importantly, those countries which expect China to yield to WTO protocols will have to behave responsibly when demand-ing it abide by international decisions beyond its own jurisdiction, not all of which will be to its liking. But if disdain is shown for the WTO process, there will be little incentive for China to comply during the difficult months ahead.
Tony Saich is a professor and chairman of the Asia programs at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US