Ever since he took office, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has not only made tremendous efforts to establish frank communication with his US counterpart, but has also been able to convince the US State Department that he is a pragmatic leader who would not recklessly pursue de jure independence.
The improvement in unofficial ties between the US and Taiwan, as evidenced by last year's deal on substantial arms sales to Taipei, the improved treatment of Taiwan's leaders making transit stops in the US and the cooperation between the two sides in the US-led war against terror, reflect a solid friendship as well as the pursuit of common interests. Most importantly, the relatively balanced approach that US President George W. Bush has adopted on cross-strait relations, in comparison with his predecessor, has also played a pivotal role.
Some have characterized the Bush administration's policy toward Taiwan and China as "strategic ambiguity with clear tactics." They mean that the US still upholds its "one China" policy and calls for the two sides of the Taiwan Strait to solve their dispute by peaceful means. In order to maintain a balanced approach toward Taipei and Beijing, however, Washington has gradually informed both Taiwan and China of its bottom line.
Bush reiterated that bottom line last month when he empha-sized the need for the US to adhere to the Taiwan Relations Act and to preserve its commitment to the people of Taiwan. He also reminded the two sides of the Strait not to provoke each other. The safeguarding of Tai-wan's democracy is the primary concern of the Bush administration, for which Taipei's ability to defend itself in the face of Bei-jing's military intimidation is also of the utmost importance.
China's growing military capability and the threat to Taiwan posed by its missiles are obviously of tremendous concern to Washington. Providing Taiwan with the weapons it needs to defend itself is therefore in line with Washington's strategic thinking in Asia.
Increasing exchanges between the militaries of the US and Tai-wan are one way for the two sides to deepen their acquaintance with each other. Minister of Defense Tang Yao-ming (湯曜明) is on a historic mission in the US, attending a private but highly political meeting. The US has rebuffed China's objections to the visit, saying it is consistent with US policy.
Tang's visit is a milestone in US-Taiwan relations. The significance of the State Department's decision to give him the green light lies largely in the fact that this represents a change in US policy toward Taiwan. His visit is the first official one by a Minister of National Defense since the switch in diplomatic recognition in 1979. The Florida conference is also the first high-level meeting attended by high-level security officials from both countries.
The government has a duty to explore every possibility to increase links between Taiwan and the rest of the world. Taiwan's strategic position vis a vis security considerations deserves more international attention than it gets, especially after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the US.
The US has redirected its foreign policy by strengthening its relations with its allies. This is a chance for Taiwan to become part of the US-led, global anti-terrorist campaign. Doing so would not only enable Taiwan to join the security alliance in the Asia-Pacific region but would also consolidate Taiwan's partnership with Washington.
Taiwan must seize the opportunity to bolster its position. For those who worry that Taipei's further tilt toward the US might irritate Beijing and undermine cross-strait stability, perhaps it's time to reject such old-fashioned thinking.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past