The DPP's party affairs reform group recently agreed that Tai-wan's head of state should assume the party chairmanship when the party is in power and that the chairman must be directly elected by the membership otherwise. If this proposal is approved at the DPP's national meeting, it impact the party's development and its relations with the Cabinet will be profound.
Party reforms have long been a controversial issue within the DPP. The party's leaders are aware that the idea of having the head of state simultaneously lead the party is not a panacea for party reforms. The move could give rise to abuse and manipulation. For instance, the president's actions and words could then be restrained by the Central Standing Committee -- a result that would limit the his freedom of policy-making. The president would also have to shoulder the party's imperfections.
Will the Cabinet turn out to be led by the party, an improper practice from the KMT era? Will important government policies have to be reviewed by the Central Standing Committee? Will the public criticize President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) for breaking his campaign promise if he takes over as the chairman? Will the party be criticized for backtracking on policy, considering that it demanded that Lee Teng-hui (
Moreover, be it in power or in opposition, the DPP has always lacked the power to constrain its legislative caucus. Now, due to the difficulty of fielding chairman candidates -- and the DPP's dysfunctional relations with the Cabinet -- it is advocating further integration between the party and the government -- turning itself into an "internally-created party." This will lead to the unification of the central party leadership and the legislative caucus. The DPP even intends to have Chen lead the party and stand in the forefront to face violent attacks from opposition parties. Serious thought should be given to the pros and cons of the proposal.
The DPP's factional politics are not appropriate for political integration and the policy-making of a ruling party. The failure to prepare for the task of governing the country when the DPP moved from an opposition party into a ruling one, has resulted in the government drifting away from its party headquarters.
In particular, when the posts of the DPP's chairman and Central Standing Committee members are mostly taken by lawmakers or local political leaders, such a situation will surely impede the functioning of the government. In addition, the nine-person task force of high-ranking DPP members from the Presidential Office and the Cabinet has yet to create a blueprint for the crucial process of political integration. Therefore, the crux of the matter lies in how to incorporate the party's policy-making mechanism in important government agencies. Whether the president should simultaneously lead the party is the crucial question.
To make long-term preparations for the DPP's governance, the structure of an "internally created party" must be built up, so that the president leads the party and the Cabinet appoints ministers and heads of other government agencies to serve as Central Standing Committee members. This is an inevitable stage in the DPP's transformation, as well as a necessary means to integrate policy-making systems and political maneuvering between the party and the Cabinet. Chen must lead the DPP to make the significant structural adjustments.
To make the president the chairman of the party might be an ill-advised plan for Chen, but it is the best way out for the DPP's future. This might not have a positive effect on Chen's re-election bid, but it will have a positive influence on the DPP and the nation's development.
Chen Sung-shan is a member of the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission of the Examination Yuan.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US