Like in many other emerging-market economies, China's official economic data leave a lot to be desired. Foreign companies considering a China play involving inward-bound investments need to ponder this fact with great care. Beijing should also come to the realization that economic numbers provided by governments require the same conditions of transparency required of private enterprises.
Trapped in the mind-set established under central planning, Chinese officials tend to offer numbers to make the central authorities happy instead of offering accurate data. This is evident in a report by China's National Bureau of Statistics that uncovered more than 62,000 violations of regulations on collecting and compiling economic figures in 2000.
Only Chinese data on the money supply and trade are considered reliable because they can be cross-referenced against data from trade partners. Meanwhile, fundamental measures like GDP growth and unemployment figures are of dubious quality.
The official unemployment rate is wildly understated by counting only the registered unemployed in the cities. The entire rural population and many blue-collar workers like those put on temporary leave because of poor performance of their enterprises are left uncounted. And only workers that are recently laid-off are counted while those engaged in new job searches are not.
From 1995 to 1999, the number of state-owned enterprises engaged in industrial activities fell to 60,000 from nearly 100,000. Yet the number of unemployed workers in urban areas during that same period rose from 2.9 percent to 3.1 percent. More recently, reports of over 5 million workers being shed by state-owned enterprises resulted in only slightly larger increases the reported jobless rate for urban areas, from 3.1 percent to 3.6 percent.
Data on GDP are scarcely better. Although China has a less advanced system of national income accounting, it quickly released final numbers on last year's growth that indicate growth of 7.3 percent. Not only do these figures defy the logic of an ongoing global slowdown, they do not appear to be internally consistent. A frequently cited inconsistency is that the usage of electrical power suggests substantially less would be consistent with the official growth estimates.
China has become the second-largest recipient of foreign direct investment in the world, after the US. Foreign investors rely heavily upon data recorded by local statisticians concerning market conditions. So legitimate questions arise whether billions of foreign-investment dollars were spent wisely. A partial answer is that the wide majority of foreign investors either loses money or is far behind in its projections on return on capital.
Without reliable and independent corroboration of official data, a useful rule of thumb should be applied to authoritarian regimes. This is to double the numbers relating to bad news and halving those that report something good. This would put the actual economic growth closer to 4 percent or possibly less.
Even this might not be enough of an adjustment. Some outside observers estimate that China's actual urban unemployment is closer to 15 percent or even 20 percent.
Beijing has openly recognized the need for improved data collection and processing and has employed foreign consultants to oversee the development of such methods. The National Bureau of Statistics has agreed to adopt data systems recommended by the IMF.
Of course, there have been some adjustments and improvements in data quality. Dai Xianglong (戴相龍), governor of the People's Bank of China, has offered a clearer look at the mountain of bad debt held by state-owned banks. It is now apparent that nonperforming loans account for just over 26 percent of total lending from the big four state-owned banks with most of the delinquent borrowers being state-owned enterprises.
However, analysts believe a more accurate proportion for nonperforming loans is 50 percent. If Beijing cannot come clean about the extent of these loans, it may not be able to muster the political will to demand job cuts and management changes as well as the liquidation and sale of assets needed to purge bad loans.
Despite a rosy picture painted by China's data gatherers, there are tough times ahead for the Middle Kingdom. Unless they come clean soon, the leaders in Beijing might be overseeing the equivalent of an Enron meltdown on a national scale.
Christopher Lingle is global strategist for eConoLytics.com and author of The Rise and Decline of the Asian Century.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS