What is this ben tu pai? Maybe something to eat? What it certainly is not is a political force that is going to dig the DPP government out of the problems caused by its minority in the legislature.
We admit to being as overoptimistic as anyone. After the legislative elections cut the pan-blue camp's advantage over its pan-green opponents by more than 20 seats, we, along with most other commentators, said that while the green camp lacked a majority in the chamber, they could probably cobble together enough votes to get the DPP's legislative agenda passed. To do so they had to rely partly on the independents and partly on the "localized" KMT, that faction of the KMT which, generally appalled at the party's flirting with the Chinese communists and complete abandonment of any pretence to even remotely care about the interests of Taiwanese, was less than happy with Lien Chan (連戰) and the mainlander neo-conservatives who were now running the party.
In the eyes of some commentators it appeared that this group was all the more powerful because we didn't actually know who was in it -- there was no self-declared membership, such as there is with DPP factions or there was with the New KMT Alliance back in the early 1990s. The very lack of identifiable members seems to have built up the group's reputation for uncanny political skills and Talleyrand-like political deviousness. It was, however, thought that Wang Jin-pyng (
Well, here's a lesson from Friday's showdown over the legislative speakerships: There is no such group. It is the political equivalent of an urban legend. And your votes for Wang were thrown away.
That doesn't mean that there aren't Taiwanese legislators in the KMT, of course. Nor does it suggest that all Taiwanese in the KMT are absolutely happy with Lien's leadership or the direction of the party. But let us face the facts: Why would Taiwanese join a party which, except for the period of apostasy during Lee Teng-hui's (
This is a truth so bitter to some that they don't want to admit it. The current brouhaha about the secret vote in the legislature is a direct result of not wanting to face reality. If only the vote were secret, goes the logic, then people would be able to betray their party -- and presumably the platform on which they were elected -- more easily. This is nonsense, and pernicious nonsense at that. People have a right to know how their representatives vote. But the current way of thinking seems to be that if it were made more easy to betray your party, then the blue camp's solidarity would be damaged. Myopic rubbish! The last thing Taiwan needs is a legislative system in which duplicity and double-dealing are made easier.
In the end it all comes down to money. As long as the KMT is the nation's third-largest business conglomerate, there are many reasons why those less idealistically motivated will throw their lot in with it. Destroy the KMT's financial power and you will destroy its hegemony. The party's history of theft and racketeering is well known. What is the Ministry of Justice waiting for?
Liberal democracy and communist autocracy are at the initial stages of a historic battle. Taipei has chosen its side in this fight and has sought to frame “cross-strait relations” as an international issue, while Beijing says that Taiwan is an “internal issue” and a hangover from the Chinese Civil War. Taiwan’s status as a nation has new clarity and the international community is beginning to defend Taiwan’s democracy. The Washington Post has praised Taiwan’s diplomatic achievements and Australian Minister for Defence Peter Dutton has said that it would be inconceivable for Australia not to join Taiwan and the US in a conflict with
At a time when China continues its assertive policy toward its neighboring countries, the regime of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Bhutan last month to resolve a longstanding border dispute. However, this is not the first time China and Bhutan have taken such efforts on this issue. Over the years, China has expanded its claim over territory in Bhutan. China claims over 764km2 of Bhutan’s territory, which includes Doklam, Sinchulung, Dramana and Shakhatoe in the northwestern region and the Pasamlung and Jakarlung Valleys in the central part of Bhutan. Although the two sides held
Among the voices expressing concern for Chinese tennis player Peng Shuai (彭帥) over the past two weeks, one was barely audible — that of her long-time former doubles partner Hsieh Su-wei (謝淑薇). Following their defeat in the WTA Finals championship match in Mexico on Nov. 18, Taiwan’s Hsieh and her Belgian partner Elise Mertens fielded questions via a Zoom call. Chinese state media had just released an incredibly suspicious e-mail, purportedly from Peng, and Canadian tennis Web site Open Court broached the issue. With the entire tennis world chiming in, seeking Hsieh’s opinion seemed obvious. However, the Web site’s reporter prefaced her question
At the Sixth Plenary Session of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) 19th Central Committee, held earlier this month, attendees passed the “Resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Major Achievements and Historical Experience of the Party Over the Past Century.” The resolution divides the CCP’s rule of China into three historical phases. The first phase was led by Mao Zedong (毛澤東), who enabled Chinese to “stand up.” The second phase occurred during the tenure of Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), who enabled China to “become rich.” The third phase began with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), who