Taiwanese reject intimidation
Despite political chaos, a major recession and Taiwan's highest unemployment rates in decades, the DPP garnered a majority of seats Saturday's elections. The victory affords the government both legislative and administrative advantages. The DPP's victory and the setback of the KMT and New Party, however, may incur a strong reaction from China.
In recent elections, Taiwan voters have never failed to agonize China by voting against its wishes. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) was elected in 1996 despite China's missile launches. In 2000, despite the threat by China's foreign minister of "severe consequences," President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was elected.
China's humiliation of Taiwan at the APEC conference in Shanghai in October might have helped the DPP win Saturday's election. The people of Taiwan have repeatedly rejected attempts to harass and humiliate them by endorsing a pro-independence party.
The lesson: With her people enjoying a free press, freedom of religion and a multiple party democracy, Taiwan will no longer tolerate any form of threats or arbitrary humiliation. Its people will celebrate their freedom by voting for those who advocate civil liberty.
When dealing with Taiwan, it is advisable for China to resort to the ABC's of civility in order to avoid more missteps. Civility and courtesy may serve as a basis for mutual trust for further engagement.
Chiehwen Ed Hsu
Fort Worth, Texas
Taiwan has lost Trump. Or so a former State Department official and lobbyist would have us believe. Writing for online outlet Domino Theory in an article titled “How Taiwan lost Trump,” Christian Whiton provides a litany of reasons that the William Lai (賴清德) and Donald Trump administrations have supposedly fallen out — and it’s all Lai’s fault. Although many of Whiton’s claims are misleading or ill-informed, the article is helpfully, if unintentionally, revealing of a key aspect of the MAGA worldview. Whiton complains of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party’s “inability to understand and relate to the New Right in America.” Many
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
Taiwan is to hold a referendum on Saturday next week to decide whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant, which was shut down in May after 40 years of service, should restart operations for as long as another 20 years. The referendum was proposed by the opposition Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and passed in the legislature with support from the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Its question reads: “Do you agree that the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should continue operations upon approval by the competent authority and confirmation that there are no safety concerns?” Supporters of the proposal argue that nuclear power
RSS