History is written by powerful people. "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." George Orwell's famous lines in his book 1984 were once again proved in Taiwan recently.
The 1992 negotiations between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to the past. President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) has the power to control the present. According to Orwell's principle, since Chen can control the present, he certainly can control the past of 1992 and the future across the Strait.
The strange thing is that the term "1992 consensus" has never officially existed. The phrase "one China, with each side having its own interpretation" (一個中國,各自表述), however, has continuously appeared in official and non-governmental documents since 1992. Politicians from all parties also used to parrot this line. But why has the phrase suddenly vanished now that the "1992 consensus" is being denied?
Is it possible that all the newspapers, magazines, books, files, documents, recordings, video tapes and computer databases that have recorded the phrase over the past eight years were thrown into 1984's "Memory Hole" and disappeared? Or have all 23 million people of Taiwan been collectively brain-washed by a certain unbelievable power to believe that the phrase, which has never existed, was real? Or was there another unbelievable power which made many people collectively forget that the phrase did exist in the past?
Those with different historical perspectives may write down "different histories" but cannot create "different historical facts."
Chen's denial of the "1992 consensus" is the denial of that the term ever existed. His denial is not an effort to control the past, nor to rewrite historical facts. But when he repudiated the existence of the phrase "one China, with each side having its own interpretation," he was rewriting historical facts and trying to control the past.
Successors universally deny and change their predecessors' policies and political paths. On the issue of national identity, the DPP has differed greatly from the KMT. If Chen wants to reverse "one China, with each side having its own interpretation" made under KMT rule -- just like his ending of the "no haste, be patient" (戒急用忍) policy -- he is certainly empowered to do so.
But to reverse a policy and to deny its existence are two different matters. To reverse a policy is to reverse a policy path. To deny its existence, however, is to deny historical fact. Chen may refuse to agree to, accept and carry on with such a policy, but he must admit to this period of history.
In the future, different historical accounts of Taiwan based on pro-unification and pro-indepen-dence viewpoints may emerge. But if different historical facts emerge on the basis of either the unification or independence stance, Taiwan may become Oceania of 1984, where the leaders become Big Brother. Its government may have a branch, called the Ministry of Truth, under which is a "Memory Hole," responsible for "vaporizing" recorded historical facts.
If Taiwan continues denying past events, what kind future lies ahead?
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Jackie Lin
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past