China seems very pleased with the outcome of the US President George W. Bush -- President Jiang Zemin (
This was not because a great deal was accomplished, but because of Jiang's extremely modest definition of what constituted a "successful" meeting. All Beijing apparently sought was a photo opportunity and a slogan. Success was achieved on both accounts, with the Chinese press touting the willingness of both sides to seek a new "constructive relationship of cooperation."
This is not insignificant. Both Washington and Beijing were eager to show that relations were on a positive trajectory after the rocky start brought about by the April 1 collision between a Chinese fighter and a US reconnaissance plane and a variety of other contentious issues, including continuing US arms sales to Taiwan. The mere fact that Bush took time out from commanding his war on terrorism to travel to China was seen as an important signal, even if accumulating international support for his anti-terrorism campaign remained a key agenda item during the abbreviated visit.
Moreover, slogans are important to China. The operative slogan prior to the APEC visit was candidate Bush's "strategic competitor" label; a phrase generally avoided by administration spokesmen after Jan. 20, but still featured prominently in the press when describing Sino-US relations. As long as Bush was willing to state in Shanghai that he sought a "constructive, and cooperative" relationship with China -- which he did (although he added the word "candid") -- Beijing was prepared to declare the visit a major success.
What Jiang was apparently not prepared to do during his first face-to-face visit with Bush was to attempt to move Sino-US relations to a higher level, as his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, clearly has done. While the Bush-Jiang meeting was described as "cordial" and "friendly," the personal chemistry exhibited from the onset between Bush and Putin was nowhere to be found.
In Shanghai, Bush and Putin took advantage of their third face-to-face meeting to move US-Russian relations even closer -- one Russian diplomat described the meeting as creating favorable conditions for "forming a new framework for strategic relations" between Washington and Moscow.
Putin sent strong signals that Russia is ready to modify or "stretch" the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty to address US security concerns. His flexibility was quickly rewarded by Washington's announcement on Oct. 25 that it was delaying testing of those elements of its missile defense system that could violate the treaty. Meanwhile, both sides also seemed closer to an agreement over deeper cuts in their respective nuclear arsenals; an arms control breakthrough likely to be formally announced during Putin's visit to Bush's Texas ranch later this month. China, by contrast, remains generally inflexible on the issue of missile defense and clearly disappointed Washington by its unwillingness to break the standoff over implementation of a non-proliferation agreement signed with the Clinton administration last year.
This is not to say that Washington was dissatisfied with the outcome of the Jiang summit. The Bush team also had relatively low expectations. But they did appear genuinely disappointed. While Bush did receive a Chinese endorsement of his war against terrorism and a commitment from Beijing to cooperate on stemming financial flows to terrorists, Jiang avoided endorsing the on-going Afghanistan campaign and felt compelled repeatedly to stress his caveats about avoiding innocent casualties -- a US objective, but one that is impossible to achieve with 100 percent success -- and ensuring a continued UN Security Council endorsement.
Jiang also expressed support for the establishment of a medium- and long-term mechanism for anti-terrorism cooperation between China and the US. Little in the way of useful, operationally-oriented intelligence information sharing has yet to materialize, however, and China seems most intent on ensuring that any international war on terrorism includes condemnation of Islamic Uighur separatists in Xinjiang Province.
Washington seems somewhat more sympathetic toward China's terrorist concerns (and Russian concerns over Islamic separatist activity in Chechnya), although here Bush had a caveat of his own: "The war on terror-ism," Bush asserted in Shanghai, "must never be an excuse to persecute minorities" (This is a message Bush has also delivered at home).
Secretary of State Colin Powell (nicely echoing a sentiment expressed previously in this column) noted in Shanghai that, as far as US-Russian relations were concerned, "not only is the Cold War over, the post-Cold War period is also over." Meanwhile, Sino-US relations still seem largely mired in what the Chinese have described in another context as a "Cold War mentality," with both sides apparently willing to settle for considerably less. As Bush and Putin start working toward the establishment of a post post-Cold War new world order, Beijing increasingly runs the risk of being left behind.
Ralph Cossa is president of the Pacific Forum CSIS, a Honolulu-based non-profit research institute affiliated with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused