I recall learning the expression "evil communist bandits" from my textbooks at a young age, but, to be honest, it is only now that I have slowly come to realize the truth of it. And yet the expression once again has a ring of untruth about it as well because the word "communist" refers to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and should imply a belief in communism. But the CCP stopped believing in communism long ago. So what do they believe in? Some say that at home they stand for "state opportunism" while, overseas, they practice "state terrorism." Actually, they practice "state terrorism" at home as well.
Since its inception, the PRC has never governed Taiwan, yet it claims that Taiwan is part of China and threatens that if Taiwan doesn't accept that claim, it will use military force to swallow it up. Chen Lung-chu (陳隆志), an international law expert, has called this typical "state terrorism." In a modern country, people can use peaceful means to seek a "split" of their nation, as in the case of Quebec, many of whose people wish to secede from Canada to create an independent state. If two countries want to unite, naturally they need to obtain the approval of their people.
A majority of the people of Taiwan do not want to unite with China. Basically, I believe this is because China has a backward economy, a dictatorial political system and lacks freedom and basic human rights. If China were free, democratic and wealthy like the US, why would anybody object to unification? But China doesn't think about improving itself and maintains a constant threat of military force against Taiwan, even to the extent of using missiles to threaten Taiwan on the eve of the nation's first presidential election when the country truly became a democracy. This is classic "state terrorism."
APEC countries issued a statement at this year's meeting in Shanghai opposing terrorism. It included wording that declared "... anti-terrorism is a fight between justice and evil, and a show of strength of civilization against barbarity, rather than a conflict among different ethnic groups, religions or cultures."
But at a press conference on Oct. 18, China's Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan (
In addition, at the informal leaders' summit, which symbolizes the spirit of APEC, China deliberately obstructed the attendance of our chosen representative, former vice president Li Yuan-zu (李元簇). This blatantly violated the 1991 Seoul Declaration, which states that APEC member countries should respect "the principle of mutual benefit and a commitment to open dialogue and consensus-building, with equal respect for the views of all participants." I'm afraid that asking a barbaric country like China to join in the fight against terrorism is totally misguided.
Since the establishment of the PRC, one political movement has followed after another -- the three evils, the five evils, the anti-rightist campaign, the rectification campaign and so on and so on. How many people fell in the resulting carnage? The Cultural Revolution was a 10-year catastrophe. In the Tiananmen Incident in 1989, several hundred thousand combat troops and tanks were deployed to crush city residents and students. If this kind of year-in and year-out abuse and slaughter of their own unarmed citizens isn't state terrorism, then what is it?
The crackdown on Falun Gong followers that began two years ago is an even more quintessential demonstration of "state terror-ism." President Jiang Zemin's (江澤民) government has vowed that it will "ruin Falun Gong followers economically, destroy their reputation and exterminate them physically." Their sexual abuse of female followers is even more blood-curdling and evil than the mistreatment of Chinese women by Japanese soldiers during World War II. What other regime would treat its own people that way?
Beijing's response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on the US has been equivocal from the start. They can only vaguely condemn "terrorist activity of any kind" and never single out the real terrorists. Rumors abound that China is actually still helping the Afghan regime with military construction projects.
Perhaps in order to counter the US, China has always banded together with all the countries in the world that actively engage in or encourage terrorism, including the former USSR, North Korea, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, Cuba, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and so on. Asking a country of China's ilk to "oppose terrorism" is a joke.
This year during World Press Freedom Day on May 1, the Committee to Protect Journalists, which is headquartered in New York, selected 10 "enemies of the press" from around the world. Jiang was choosen -- for the fifth year in a row -- for seriously manipulating domestic media and limiting freedom of speech. He was surpassed only by Iran's Ayatollah Khamenei and Liberia's Charles Taylor.
The committee said that 22 journalists holding "dissident views" were jailed or sentenced to labor reform in China at the end of last year, more than in any other country. In addition, since Jiang fears the Internet will interfere with Beijing's control over information, he has invested tremendous resources to monitor and control the content of domestic Web sites. A number of newspapers that had insisted on editorial independence were forced to close or reorganize their management. Is this not "state terrorism?"
The strange thing is that many media organizations in Taiwan are infatuated with China and take pains to gloss over its state terrorism. What are they doing?
Chang Ching-hsi is a professor in the department of economics at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused