The Ministry of Education has officially launched a "Nine-Year Educational Program" in an effort to integrate elementary and junior high school programs. However, the English language education section in the program is a cause for worry because of the shortage of qualified teachers and of teaching resources.
The ministry even recommended, in its sample lesson plans, that local teachers teach English pronunciation with the help of the Mandarin phonetic symbols (
According to the ministry, teachers can eliminate the students' fear of English by using "bopomofo," since learning the phonetic system is a requirement for all schoolchildren. The ministry has, however, ignored the possible impact of such an approach.
English and Mandarin Chinese belong to different linguistic families with distinctive phonetic notations. The use of "bopomofo" may facilitate the learning of other Chinese languages, such as Taiwanese and Hakka, which share the same roots as Mandarin. But it will not be of any use in learning English.
What is particularly worrying is that young students might be misled when learning English pronunciation with the "bopomofo" system. In Japan, for instance, some English teachers use the Japanese phonetic alphabet, which consists of the basic "50 sounds." As a result, many students either mispronounce certain English sounds or simply cannot enunciate them at all. Their ability to acquire a second language has been seriously hampered.
Plus, according to the "critical period" hypothesis of language acquisition, most children stand a much better chance of becoming "accent free" if they learn a language before they hit puberty. If the teacher fails to demonstrate accurate pronunciation from the very beginning, most learners may never achieve clear pronunciation later.
If we are truly to improve the English-language education of our youngsters, we need to strive for the following goals.
First, more effective teaching methods are needed. For example, instead of the mastery of a list of phonetic sounds, a top-down approach should be adopted, as the most relevant features of pronunciation, including stress, rhythm and intonation, need to be emphasized in the classroom.
Second, many public schools only provide one or two classes per week of English education, which is much less than those in Singapore or Hong Kong.
Third, local teachers must strive to improve themselves at all times. As an English teacher trainer, I have found that many of our English teachers actually have a great fear of the language. Sometimes they even ask me to speak only Chinese during work-shops.
If teachers can improve their own language ability, especially their pronunciation, they will be much more confident and will never have to use "bopomofo" to teach the ABC's.
The ministry should also recruit more native speakers of English, so that both local students and teachers can frequently interact with native English speakers.
The ministry's effort to include more creative teaching methods in English language education is praiseworthy. But using the "bopomofo" system is not only not a good idea, it should never be adopted.
According to leading TESOL professor, Douglas Brown, "Our goals as teachers of English pronunciation should be focused on clear, comprehensible pronunciation." It is to be hoped that the ministry will be more careful when promoting English language education.
Chang Sheng-en is an English teacher trainer at the English Advanced Association in Taipei.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS