Kennedy misses the mark
Some time ago your columnist Brian Kennedy wrote a surreal column attacking the burning of ghost money because of the fire risk involved. At the time I attributed his dereliction of duty and gross contempt of a deeply-felt religious practice of Taiwanese people to a fit of pique.
But his column ("`Soft talk, big stick' the only policy," Sept. 13, page 8) confirms my suspicions and seriously compromises Kennedy's claim to human rights advocacy.
Apart from the ludicrousness of quoting that classic anti-establishment figure, Malcolm X, in rhetorically framing future US-sanctioned violence in response to this week's events Kennedy dares to salute Israel for its conduct in recent years, conduct which has included the legalized torture of criminal suspects. He also regards that state as "an example well worth following" in dealing with security matters. This is a recipe for unending catastrophe. What's next, Brian? A pat on the back and a bouquet for Ariel Sharon?
Suicidal terrorists are fueled by righteous indignation and their belief in pursuing a cause to death is the reason why they are so profoundly dangerous. The weapons they can now carry are microscopic, and can cause human damage in numbers exponentially greater than that experienced in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
So, without understanding the complexity of world conflict, without noting the enduring lack of interest of Americans in the conduct of their government overseas and without cooperation from most Islamic and Arab states, it is hard to see how any amount of future US government chest-thumping will prevent these and future terrorists from doing this all over again.
Averting future tragedy on a colossal scale requires wisdom at every level, not just that relating to intelligence collection and dropping smart bombs. As we enter a new era of insecurity and sorrow, Kennedy would do well to read the admirably sober Taipei Times editorial accompanying his article and try to transcend sloganeering and name-dropping.
Martin Williams
Taipei
We must fight hatred
The horrific terrorist attacks in the US are a poignant warning to human civilization. What is the aim of civilization? If we are guided by hatred, there is no light at the end of the tunnel for our exploration of civilization. I was shocked, like others. Do we have enough modern tools to eliminate hatred and improve the lives of all humans?
The US is not alone in its tragic encounter. The elites all over the world should together think up a way to handle our real enemy: hatred. Terrorists have become the cheap, horrific alternative to atomic weapons.
Ni Kuojung
Hsinchu City
No `old immigrants'
I read Taitzer Wang's (
However, I'd like to point out his use of the misleading terms "old and new immigrants." There can be only new immigrants, not old ones. The offspring of new immigrants are all natives, just as my parents are new immigrants from Taiwan but I am a native-born American. I am not an immigrant in any normal sense of the word. It has been my understanding that the Aboriginals and those who were born in Taiwan are all native Taiwanese, and only those who were born in China and later came to Taiwan are immigrants.
Tessa Hildebrand
Littleton, Colorado
`Jihad' is misunderstood
It was quite surprising how Chen Shin-min (
Being a Muslim, I've never come across jihad being used for the purpose of "spreading the teachings of Allah."
Sure, it may be about the protection of religion but it is more about the protection of national populations, protection of land resources and ensuring that the country exists in peace.
Jihad can only be applied in a country where the main religion is Islam and the law is based on the Shariah, which is Islamic law. To "spread the teachings of Islam," the fundamental rule in Islam is not to inflict pain or cause massacres.
Muslims are not allowed to "Bible-thump" or bribe a person into religion because it is a sin to do so. The reason for this is that to do so is to insult Islam rather than promote it. This is clearly documented.
If Muslim countries were intolerant of other religions then why do I see churches, synagogues and temples in those countries?
Jihad is clearly what the declaration of war is today. Any outside force that decides to come in, cause massacres and force you to change your beliefs, then that country has the right to declare a Jihad, which, trans-lated, means "struggle."
Yahya Saeed
Birmingham, UK
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers