KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has finally made a goodwill gesture toward President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), saying that he is willing to initiate party-to-party negotiations after the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It has apparently dawned on Lien that Taiwan's economy will only sink ever deeper if opposition parties continue to boycott the ruling party and render it powerless, and that only partisan cooperation can revive the economy. The goodwill has come late, but better late than never.
That Lien should have viewed the conference, Chen's brainchild, with suspicion is understandable. In October last year, no sooner had Lien walked out of a summit with Chen at the Presidential Office -- where they had discussed the economy, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (
The Chen administration's flippant handling of the issue caused Lien to lose faith in the ruling party's credibility and consequently to close the door to partisan negotiations. Lien also rejected Chen's invitation to serve as vice chairman of the conference, though the KMT did not object when the Presidential Office invited Vincent Siew (
Of course, Lien also had his own reasons for expressing his acceptance of the conference shortly before it began.
First, the KMT sees the conference as an important means to revive Taiwan's economy. The key suggestions reached during its panel discussions -- to relax the "no haste, be patient" policy and to establish direct links with China -- are in line with the KMT's official policy and it therefore does not want to be absent from the conference. In fact, it wants to vie for a leading role in the implementation of the consensus reached at the conference, so as to share credit for its results.
The KMT can also use this opportunity to strut its large economic talent pool and show the electorate that it is the party with the real ability to govern. This will certainly be beneficial for the KMT in the year-end elections.
Second, by suggesting political negotiations, Lien has stolen the initiative before the PFP's James Soong (
Finally, the KMT-led opposition alliance wants to maintain a legislative majority after the year-end elections and gain enough power to form a Cabinet. If the economy continues to deteriorate, such an alliance would stand to inherit a pile of economic ruin which would very much be to the detriment of a KMT-led Cabinet. It won't be until the first quarter of next year before the implementation of the conference's conclusions begin to bear fruit. At that time, the opposition alliance can grandly claim all the credit for the economy's recovery.
Regardless of the KMT's motivations, both the Presidential Office and the ruling party should welcome its entry onto the scene because any conclusion reached at the conference will remain hollow without endorsement from the opposition parties, particularly the KMT.
The country stands to benefit from cooperation between the ruling and opposition parties. This will be a victory for all, no matter what selfish motives are behind cooperation.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers