KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) has finally made a goodwill gesture toward President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), saying that he is willing to initiate party-to-party negotiations after the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It has apparently dawned on Lien that Taiwan's economy will only sink ever deeper if opposition parties continue to boycott the ruling party and render it powerless, and that only partisan cooperation can revive the economy. The goodwill has come late, but better late than never.
That Lien should have viewed the conference, Chen's brainchild, with suspicion is understandable. In October last year, no sooner had Lien walked out of a summit with Chen at the Presidential Office -- where they had discussed the economy, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (
The Chen administration's flippant handling of the issue caused Lien to lose faith in the ruling party's credibility and consequently to close the door to partisan negotiations. Lien also rejected Chen's invitation to serve as vice chairman of the conference, though the KMT did not object when the Presidential Office invited Vincent Siew (
Of course, Lien also had his own reasons for expressing his acceptance of the conference shortly before it began.
First, the KMT sees the conference as an important means to revive Taiwan's economy. The key suggestions reached during its panel discussions -- to relax the "no haste, be patient" policy and to establish direct links with China -- are in line with the KMT's official policy and it therefore does not want to be absent from the conference. In fact, it wants to vie for a leading role in the implementation of the consensus reached at the conference, so as to share credit for its results.
The KMT can also use this opportunity to strut its large economic talent pool and show the electorate that it is the party with the real ability to govern. This will certainly be beneficial for the KMT in the year-end elections.
Second, by suggesting political negotiations, Lien has stolen the initiative before the PFP's James Soong (
Finally, the KMT-led opposition alliance wants to maintain a legislative majority after the year-end elections and gain enough power to form a Cabinet. If the economy continues to deteriorate, such an alliance would stand to inherit a pile of economic ruin which would very much be to the detriment of a KMT-led Cabinet. It won't be until the first quarter of next year before the implementation of the conference's conclusions begin to bear fruit. At that time, the opposition alliance can grandly claim all the credit for the economy's recovery.
Regardless of the KMT's motivations, both the Presidential Office and the ruling party should welcome its entry onto the scene because any conclusion reached at the conference will remain hollow without endorsement from the opposition parties, particularly the KMT.
The country stands to benefit from cooperation between the ruling and opposition parties. This will be a victory for all, no matter what selfish motives are behind cooperation.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US