At Frankfurt International Airport, three Taiwanese businessmen returning to Taiwan were refused boarding passes by a Lufthansa staffer at the airline's counter. The clerk told the men that if they wanted to go to Tai-wan, they would need a "Taiwan visa." Because he couldn't locate such a visa in their passports, he said he was unable to allow them onto the plane.
The trio didn't know whether to laugh or cry. They argued that they were Taiwanese trying to return home, and thus didn't need a visa, to which the clerk replied, "You are all holding passports for the Republic of China, not Taiwan!" After numerous explanations, checking and re-checking, Lufthansa finally let the hapless travellers board the flight.
This was not an isolated case. There are numerous examples of inconveniences suffered by ROC passport holders.
There is the case of a student studying in the US, who attended a conference in Kenya. Afterwards, he wanted to fly back to the US, via London. But staff at the Kenya airport counter said that "Chinese" nationals heading to London airport -- whether passing through customs or just changing planes -- must have a British visa.
The student said that as a "Taiwanese" he didn't need a visa. The airport staff insisted he was a holding a "Chinese" passport. After exhaustive negotiations and a call to London, the student was allowed onto the plane.
Yet another US-based student was trying to go to Cairo, via London. Taiwanese visiting Egypt can apply for a 30-day (or longer) visa, while Chinese citizens are only given a 10-day visa. The London airport staff processing the student's ticket saw that it showed a 20-day stay, thought it was suspicious and refused to allow the student to board the plane. Once again it took extensive deliberations before the student was able to continue on his way.
More and more Chinese are traveling abroad, and each country's customs and police officers have adopted different methods of handling Chinese and Taiwanese. Because they are more likely to engage in crimes such as smuggling and illegal immigration, Chinese tend to be checked more stringently. Thus, people from Taiwan who are frequent travellers hope that an explanation can be added to their ROC passports, enabling customs and police officials to understand their unique identity. Perhaps the most acceptable method of doing this would be to add the word "Taiwan" to the ROC passport.
Yao Chia-wen is a senior advisor to the president.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US