Don't bet on the Olympics
In reference to your editorial, ("Olympic decision hurts Tai-wan," July 18, page 8), both Toronto and Paris have stronger credentials than Beijing in terms of infrastructure, corruption, air quality, water quality and ambient temperature. Be-sides, about 70 percent of the planned contest facilities and the Olympics village still need to be constructed in Beijing. In Beijing, therefore, the Interna-tional Olympic Committee (IOC) made a political choice to host the 2008 Games. This is why the IOC's talk of being non-political is sheer hypocrisy.
Of course, it is a shame that the IOC also overlooks the Chinese government's extremely dismal human rights record and its continual military threat to Taiwan. The Chinese government may have scored high marks for nationalism, but it has failed miserably in both prosperity (about NT$28,000 per capita GDP currently) and civil liberties (there were very few to begin with and they don't appear to be increasing).
Beijing residents will benefit greatly from the preparation and construction for the 2008 Games. But the vast majority (99 percent) of the 1.3-billion people in China will see reduced budgets for education and welfare, because a huge amount of funds (estimated at 160 billion yuan) will solely go to Beijing -- further widening the gap between rich and poor regions in China.
There is a hope or a theory that the Chinese government will now be motivated and/or forced to open up and reform. But I wouldn't bet on it.
Donald S. Shih
St. Louis, Missouri
Chien's column off the mark
I share Chien Shiuh-Shen's (簡旭伸) opinion that Taiwan must rely more on itself for protection ("Taiwan can't count on Washington," July 23, page 8). But, by taking the radical and unfair view that Taiwan must do so because the US is a greedy, untrustworthy nation is very misguided. It's easy to be cynical about the US' motives, but Taiwan simply has no one else.
Taiwan's government doesn't seem to take the matter of war seriously as it maintains only a relatively feeble military. Who else could Taiwan count on? Asia? Asian nations have never been able to unite to provide collective security because each country pursues it's own self-centered agenda, unable to even appreciate the ethics behind fighting for a neighbor's rights of self-determination.
Western Europe? Other than the US, Canada and Australia, it's the only part of the world that takes democratic values seriously, but it refuses to spend the time and money necessary to provide effective security for anyone, even itself.
If not America, who? The US has no duty to protect Taiwan and Taiwan should consider itself lucky that the US devised the Taiwan Relations Act, the only thing which keeps Taiwan in the minds of Washington decision-makers. Indeed, Taiwan should provide security for itself. But the only nation which has the power to help -- and considers it a moral responsibility to do so -- is America.
Wendell Yang
College Station, Texas
About all I learned from Chien's ridiculous argument about US interests is what a desperate need there is to teach analytical skills in Taiwan's schools.
For example, Chien argues that the motive behind the US military campaign in Kosovo was to "create political instability in Europe." What possible reason would the US have for doing so? Has instability in Europe ever been in US interests? Chien's assertion, with no evidence of US intentions, reveals an ignorance unworthy of an academic. A simple trip to the library would open a world of knowledge that he obviously lacks.
Further, his assertion that the US "initiated a rise in oil prices" is just factually wrong. Cheap prices for a decade removed incentives to maintain and ex-pand refinery capacity. On top of that, a large part of the transport ships were retired without being replaced. US refineries are at 90 percent capacity, and together with an increase in consump-tion, prices rose. That's market forces, not conspiracy.
Chien's other assertions are equally devoid of evidence and logic, and don't bear repeating. Suffice it to say, Chien has a lot of homework to do.
Brian Shea
Herndon, Virginia
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US