The Taiwan Solidarity Union
(
Even as it forms, the TSU has been the center of controversy because it has raised the "pro-Lee" banner, taken a "localiza-tion" platform, vowed to help the Chen Shui-bian (
However, after the party announced its name on July 24, the KMT, DPP and People First Party all said that the TSU's establishment will not have any major impact on them in the year-end election. In fact, people are still evaluating the prospects of this party.
Taiwan has a unique "single non-transferrable vote in multi-member districts" system in its legislative elections. For its presidential elections it adopts the plurality or "first-past-the-post" system. These differing systems are likely to generate two diamet-rically opposite forces in terms of shaping public opinion. A plurality system can easily generate centripetal incentives for candidates and causes them to seek support from a majority of the electorate.
Due to the psychological effects generated by strategic voting (known in Taiwan as "dumping one candidate to save another"), votes are likely to concentrate in the hands of two major candidates. On the other hand, a "single non-transferrable vote in multi-member districts" system generates centrifugal incentives for the candidates.
In other words, candidates will not move closer to the center, but will be scattered throughout the political spectrum and try to win the loyal support of specific minority groups that can give them enough votes to win.
In Taiwan's legislative elections, there are many reasons why voters pick a particular candidate. The social divisions formed by different views toward independence or unification with China is a key demarcation with the largest bases for partisan support. A listing of the major political parties in terms of their platforms on the independence-unification spectrum (from left to right): Taiwan Independence Party, DPP, KMT, PFP and New Party. The positioning of the TSU on the independence-unification spectrum -- as well as the party's strategy for partitioning different sectors of the electorate -- will affect its ability to develop a voter base. It will also determine which existing party will lose the largest chunk of its voter base to the TSU.
Throughout its preparatory phase, the TSU has stressed its position as a pro-localization, middle-way party. But it is increasingly being defined as farther to the left than the DPP on the independence-unification spectrum -- following the grand reception given to former president Lee Teng-hui (
Therefore, the party stands to have a bigger impact on the DPP's votes than on KMT and PFP votes. Certainly, the KMT -- not the DPP -- is happy to see this happen. Even if the TSU does not want to be defined this way, its ability to garner the support of middle-ground voters will be a decisive factor in its ability to develop a voter base.
In the year-end legislative elections, the union only needs to win more than 5 percent of all votes to surpass the party threshold and win a number of constituent and "at-large" seats.
But in fact, the strategic value of the number of seats won by the TSU does not depend entirely on how many seats it will snatch away from the DPP or the KMT. Rather, the value lies in whether it can help prevent the pan-KMT opposition alliance from winning a legislative majority.
If, as a result of the TSU's participation in the elections, the opposition alliance loses control over a legislative majority of more than 113 seats, then an "85 plus 35" partisan reshuffle is not entirely impossible.
If the opposition alliance still manages to win a majority despite the TSU's participation, then the party's post-election influence will be greatly reduced. The party achieves its optimum tactical goal when it manages to chip away votes from a good number of pan-KMT candidates and causes them to lose. For this reason, how the TSU will be positioned on the independence-unification spectrum will be of particular importance -- it will determine whose votes the TSU will chip away.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Francis Huang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry