In the second half of last year, the presidents of three Asian democracies -- Joseph Estrada of the Philippines, Abdurrahman Wahid of Indonesia, and Chen Shui-bian (
The sagas of all three men have many similarities. All three countries have just emerged from decades of authoritarian rule to become democracies. The old order collapsed and a power vacuum emerged during the transition to a new democratic order. The new leaders, who had little experience in governance, were on the defensive and powerless to effectively tackle social problems. This has resulted in public disgruntlement.
On top of this, the global economic downturn has dented the three nations' economies and their governments have been unable to come up with effective stimulus measures. Inevitably, public discontent has been rising and powerful opposition parties have been twisting the arms of their governments.
But Chen is different from Wahid and Estrada. Chen has not been suspected of serious moral lapses, just lack of administrative and economic experience, therefore neither the public nor the media supported the opposition's recall drive to punish him for halting the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (
Neither Wahid nor Estrada worked hard enough to tackle the political and economic problems facing their countries. Instead, they were obsessed with power struggles that led to impasse between the ruling and opposition parties, which in turn led to their own ouster.
The biggest difference between Chen and the others though, is that over his 14 months in office he has strongly demonstrated his desire for reform.
Despite continuing domestic problems and the disappointing performance of his government, people can feel the dedication and efforts that his officials have put into problem-solving. This has somewhat eased public dissatisfaction. Over the past 14 months, Chen has gone on two overseas diplomatic tours and scored good results in relations with the US and arms procurement. Upon his return from a Latin America tour in early June, he quickly set up a cross-party advisory council on economic affairs and went all-out into organizing the Economic Development Advisory Conference. The first session of the conference was held on Sunday -- a first step toward building a consensus on how to solve the country's economic as well as political problems.
Will Chen become Asia's third president to be impeached? The likely answer is no -- if he can learn a lesson from the ousters of Wahid and Estrada; keep in mind his predecessor Lee Teng-hui's (
John F. Kennedy was deemed unfit for the presidency when he took office, but he proved himself one of the better US presidents in the post-war period. Chen did not have a smooth beginning, but he has a chance to grow in office as Kennedy did and to leave his mark on Taiwan.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers