An evolution of ties
After President Chen Shui-Bian (
I think that period could be instructive. President Jiang Zemin (江澤民) has recently asserted that China's self-unifying expansion is historically inevitable. I can accept its inevitability but its terms are still unclear. China's expansions into Tibet, Eastern Russia, Mongolia, Hong Kong, Macau and the South China Sea have been driven as much by the need for land and resources as for the purpose of national defense.
But China's desire to annex Taiwan has created a situation in which both sides are rejecting traditional solutions. Taiwan rejects the traditional solution of being a province of China. China rejects the traditional solution of Taiwan being a sovereign state.
These rejections leave us with a situation much like the silence after the election; no one has a name for the way the situation is evolving. Perhaps this is the best state of affairs. Perhaps, regardless of the uncertainty over Taiwan's future, Taiwan and China are pioneering a new form of international relations.
I would like to make several suggestions: One, all parties to the dispute agree to disagree. Two, all parties to the dispute stop trying to put one name or one formula on the situation. Three, all parties to the dispute agree that evolution rather than war is the best process for resolving the dispute. Four, all parties to the dispute put as much energy as possible into the myriad constructive links that are moving Taiwan and China slowly toward a workable future together.
David Cornberg
Taipei
Bad treatment by Japan
Taiwanese residing in Japan are compelled by Tokyo to have their nationality registered as "Chinese." For years, many Taiwanese have requested the Immigration Bureau to correct it to "Taiwanese," only to be ignored, or even rudely humiliated. This has been a major insult and a cause of pain for people from Taiwan living in Japan. Taiwan's dignity has also been crassly trampled upon by the Japanese government.
For that reason we launched an all-out protest in Japan
yesterday against the Japanese government's false recording of nationality. We will demand that our nationality be corrected as "Taiwanese." Meanwhile, we will appeal to the Japanese people, media and politicians and seek support from all sides.
We hereby call on our fellow Taiwanese to show their concern over the issue by lodging protests with Japan's representative office in Taipei, the Interchange Association (
Let's fight together for the dignity of Taiwanese in Japan.
Lin Chien-liang
Chairman, Taiwanese Association in Japan
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.